IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v2y1978i3p257-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighing Conflicting Concerns In Frontier Development

Author

Listed:
  • DENNIS M. PAPROSKI

Abstract

It is no longer perceived that development proposals will automatically assure a net improvement in social well‐being. This is particularly so in the case of frontier development. In these areas, information on economic and engineering costs and social and environmental effects is scarce, and projected outcomes from such a base are therefore questionable. The views of indigenous populations living in frontier areas can provide a valuable insight into possible effects of development, as shown in the decision‐making process regarding natural gas pipeline construction in the Canadian northwest. Reference to this case suggests that it may be possible to design this process to permit economic development and to assure that environmental, social and local economic objectives are met.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis M. Paproski, 1978. "Weighing Conflicting Concerns In Frontier Development," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 257-270, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:2:y:1978:i:3:p:257-270
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1978.tb00212.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1978.tb00212.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1978.tb00212.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:2:y:1978:i:3:p:257-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.