IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v26y2002i1p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for policy formulation for small‐scale mines: the case of coal in China

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Andrews‐Speed
  • Armando Zamora
  • Christopher D. Rogers
  • Lei Shen
  • Shelley Cao
  • Minying Yang

Abstract

The effective management of small‐scale mines is one of the major challenges for governments in the mining sector. Small‐scale mining may bring tangible, short‐term benefits to the communities involved. However, these benefits are frequently outweighed by the costs incurred in terms of illness, injury, pollution, waste of natural resources and market distortions. Governments, international agencies and advisers are generally able to draw up lists of actions which are required to regulate and manage small‐scale mines more effectively, but turning plans into sustained action has proved more difficult. Two aspects of policy implementation are crucial to success: the alignment of interests, and the attitude and effectiveness of government. Using a case study of township and village coal mines in China, this article develops an approach to analysing these issues that could assist regional policy makers and advisers in formulating policy, in identifying key obstacles to policy implementation, and in identifying particular parties which need to be infiuenced or educated in order for the policy to succeed.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Andrews‐Speed & Armando Zamora & Christopher D. Rogers & Lei Shen & Shelley Cao & Minying Yang, 2002. "A framework for policy formulation for small‐scale mines: the case of coal in China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 26(1), pages 45-54, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:45-54
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.00005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.00005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.