IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v19y1995i1p59-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financing water supply and sanitation under Agenda 21

Author

Listed:
  • John Briscoe
  • Harvey A Garn

Abstract

This paper assesses the financing challenges which have to be met by developing countries if water resources are to be managed efficiently, if the quality of the aquatic environment is to be improved and if water related services are to be delivered in a responsive, efficient and equitable way. This paper takes the view that attaching ‘price tags’ to water supply and sanitation, as was tentatively done in Agenda 21, is a misguided approach and that what is needed is articulation of clear principles which should underpin the financing of water supply and sanitation investments. To illustrate the approach the paper focuses heavily on experiences from World Bank water supply, sanitation and urban development projects over the past 30 years. The challenge is to develop appropriate institutional and financial arrangements. The essence of such arrangements is that they ensure that societies mobilize appropriate levels of resources for providing water related environmental services and that these resources are used in the most efficient and effective way possible.

Suggested Citation

  • John Briscoe & Harvey A Garn, 1995. "Financing water supply and sanitation under Agenda 21," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 59-70, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:59-70
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1995.tb00593.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1995.tb00593.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1995.tb00593.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emanuele Lobina & David Hall, 2008. "The comparative advantage of the public sector in the development of urban water supply," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 8(1), pages 85-101, January.
    2. Heidler, A. & Nesi, Muhil & Nikiema, J. & Luthi, C., 2023. "Multilateral development banks investment behaviour in water and sanitation: findings and lessons from 60 years of investment projects in Africa and Asia," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 13(5):362-3.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:59-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.