IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p830-839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enabling patient safety awareness using the Green Cross method: A qualitative description of users’ experience

Author

Listed:
  • Anneli Schwarz
  • Stina Isaksson
  • Ulrika Källman
  • Marie Rusner

Abstract

Aim The Green Cross method was developed to support healthcare staff in daily patient safety work. The aim of this study was to describe users’ experiences of the method when working with patient safety and their views on the core elements. Background Patient safety systems need to be user‐friendly to facilitate learning from adverse events. The Green Cross method is described as a simple visual method to recognise risks and preventable adverse events (PAEs) in real time. There are no previous studies describing users’ experiences of the Green Cross method. Design A qualitative descriptive design. Methods 32 healthcare workers and managers from different specialties in a Swedish hospital were interviewed, from May–September 2018 about their experiences of the Green Cross method; either individually or as part of a group. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The study follows the COREQ guidelines for qualitative data. Results Participants associated the Green Cross method with patient safety, but no core elements of the method were identified. Instead, the opportunity to be engaged in patient safety work in a systematic way was underlined by all study participants. Highlighted key areas were the simplicity and the systematic framework of the method along with a need of distinct leadership. The daily meetings promoted trust and dialogue and developed the patient safety mindset. Daily meetings, together with the visualisation of the cross, were emphasised as important by users who otherwise had limited knowledge of the entire method. Conclusion This study offers valuable information that can help deepen the understanding of how the method specifically supports patient safety work. Relevance to clinical practice Healthcare workers are expected to report patient safety issues. This study presents user‐friendly aspects of the method as well as limitations, relevant for present and future users.

Suggested Citation

  • Anneli Schwarz & Stina Isaksson & Ulrika Källman & Marie Rusner, 2021. "Enabling patient safety awareness using the Green Cross method: A qualitative description of users’ experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 830-839, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:830-839
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:830-839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.