IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p765-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does the environment influence consumers' perceptions of safety in acute mental health units? A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Ann Cutler
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
  • Jenny Sim
  • Moira Stephens
  • Lorna Moxham

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how the physical and social environment of acute mental health units influences consumers' perception and experience of safety. Background Acute mental health units are places in which consumers should feel safe. Not all consumers, however, feel safe in this environment. Little is known about what contributes to consumers' feelings of safety in this setting. Design The study used a qualitative descriptive design, influenced by naturalistic enquiry. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and are reported according to the COREQ checklist. Methods Fifteen people who had experienced admission to an acute mental health unit were individually interviewed. Results Having a supportive environment enhanced consumers' perception and experience of safety. A supportive environment was experienced when consumers had privacy, felt safe from other consumers and had meaningful activities to participate in within the acute mental health unit. In contrast, having their privacy breached by other consumers made participants feel unsafe. Many participants were fearful of other consumers, and felt unsafe and unable to protect themselves. Lack of meaningful activities led to boredom and contributed to consumers feeling unsafe. Conclusions Personal spaces should address consumers' privacy needs without compromising staff access. Staff presence enhances consumers' feelings of safety, but this need can be heightened when consumers are unable to alert staff when they feel unsafe. Meaningful activities link consumers to their lives outside of the hospital and can enhance recovery. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding how the acute unit environment is perceived by consumers can assist nurses and managers to promote feelings of safety among consumers. Feeling safe can, in turn, optimise recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Ann Cutler & Elizabeth Halcomb & Jenny Sim & Moira Stephens & Lorna Moxham, 2021. "How does the environment influence consumers' perceptions of safety in acute mental health units? A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 765-772, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:765-772
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalie Ann Cutler & Jenny Sim & Elizabeth Halcomb & Lorna Moxham & Moira Stephens, 2020. "Nurses' influence on consumers' experience of safety in acute mental health units: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4379-4386, November.
    2. Rosemary C Stenhouse, 2013. "‘Safe enough in here?’: patients' expectations and experiences of feeling safe in an acute psychiatric inpatient ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3109-3119, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Ann Cutler & Jenny Sim & Elizabeth Halcomb & Lorna Moxham & Moira Stephens, 2020. "Nurses' influence on consumers' experience of safety in acute mental health units: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4379-4386, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:765-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.