IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p687-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronic limb‐threatening ischaemia and reframing the meaning of ‘end’

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Monaro
  • Sandra West
  • Janice Gullick

Abstract

Introduction The possibility of amputation and/or death from chronic limb‐threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is real, and deeper understandings of the person and family's capacity and preparedness for limb loss and clinical interventions (active or palliative) are required. Background The lead‐in period to the surgeon's recommendation for amputation for CLTI may be sudden or protracted; the number/invasiveness of previous revascularisation interventions varies, and limb loss and end‐of‐life considerations frame the experience. Method This prospective, longitudinal, interpretative phenomenological study in three vascular surgical units involved 19 CLTI journeys. Participants were interviewed when making decisions about amputation (15 patients, 12 family members) and, where applicable, 6‐months postamputation (8 patients, 7 family members). Hermeneutic interpretation using Heidegger's philosophical construct of Being‐towards‐death guided the analysis. The COREQ checklist ensured rigour in research reporting. Findings Some participants were unable to face the possibility of death and metaphorically ‘fled’, either through productive optimism or through hoping for more time (Heidegger's inauthentic positioning towards death). For others, authentic positionings of Being‐towards‐death were understood as: the confrontation of the certainty of their death by making choices about how to die; the indefiniteness of death where treatment choices influenced timing, yet the time for death remained unknown; the nonrelational nature of death, as the journey could only be lived by the person; and death as not to be outstripped, where for some, there was a freeing of oneself for amputation and/or death. Discussion The term ‘end of limb’ to denote the futility of the limb is a useful marker that emphasises the noncurative nature of CLTI. This may help to instigate and support discussions about end of life to support palliation care planning and the person and family's existential preparation for death. Conclusion Death frames the experience of CLTI. Using ‘end‐of‐limb’ and ‘end‐of‐life’ terminology may facilitate a family/patient‐centred approach to possible amputation and other conservative or palliative strategies. Relevance to Clinical Practice Understanding of CLTI illness experience. Decisions about revascularisation, amputation or conservative care. End‐of‐life care for CLTI.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Monaro & Sandra West & Janice Gullick, 2021. "Chronic limb‐threatening ischaemia and reframing the meaning of ‘end’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 687-700, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:687-700
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Monaro & Sandra West & Jana Pinkova & Janice Gullick, 2018. "The chaos of hospitalisation for patients with critical limb ischaemia approaching major amputation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3530-3543, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Monaro & Sandra West & Janice Gullick, 2020. "The body with chronic limb‐threatening ischaemia: A phenomenologically derived understanding," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1276-1289, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:687-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.