IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p528-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing workload assessment in an intensive care unit: A 5‐year retrospective analysis

Author

Listed:
  • João Lindo Simões
  • Pedro Sa‐Couto
  • Carlos Jorge Simões
  • Cátia Oliveira
  • Neuza Maia dos Santos
  • José Mateus
  • Carlos Pires Magalhães
  • Matilde Martins

Abstract

Aims To study the correlation between the workload of intensive care nursing teams and the sociodemographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics of patients in critical condition in a Portuguese Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during a 5‐year period. Background Currently, indices of nursing workload quantification are one of the resources used for planning and evaluating ICUs. Evidence shows that there are several factors related to critical patients and their hospitalisation which potentially influence the nursing workload. Design Retrospective cohort analysis of a health record database from adult patients admitted to a Portuguese ICU between 1 January 2015–31 December 2019. Methods Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS‐28) scores of 730 adult patients. Three TISS‐28 assessments were considered: first assessment, last assessment and average. The STROBE guidelines were used in reporting this study. Results The TISS‐28 has an average of 34.2 ± 6.9 points at admission, which is considered a high nursing workload. A somewhat lower result was found for the discharge and average assessments. It shows that basic activities accounted for the highest percentage of time spent (38.0%), followed by the cardiovascular support category (26.5%). The TISS‐28 shows consistent results throughout the study period, despite a small trend reduction in the last 2 years. Conclusions Lower workloads were found for age ≤44 years and with a shorter length of stay. Higher workload was more probable in patients classified in Cullen Class IV (OR = 2.5) and with a normal to higher weight percentile (OR = 1.9 and 1.5, respectively). Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of the factors influencing the nursing workload facilitates the implementation of rules to improve performance in nursing interventions, based on the redefinition of care priorities, increased productivity, human resources management and reduction of additional costs to the organisation, related to possible adverse events, among others.

Suggested Citation

  • João Lindo Simões & Pedro Sa‐Couto & Carlos Jorge Simões & Cátia Oliveira & Neuza Maia dos Santos & José Mateus & Carlos Pires Magalhães & Matilde Martins, 2021. "Nursing workload assessment in an intensive care unit: A 5‐year retrospective analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 528-540, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:528-540
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nastasja Robstad & Ulrika Söderhamn & Liv Fegran, 2018. "Intensive care nurses’ experiences of caring for obese intensive care patients: A hermeneutic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 386-395, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:528-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.