IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p433-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency stress management among nurses: A lesson from the COVID‐19 outbreak in China–a cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Changju Liao
  • Linghong Guo
  • Cuicui Zhang
  • Meiqi Zhang
  • Wenjing Jiang
  • Ying Zhong
  • Qingfang Lin
  • Yin Liu

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the level of stress response, self‐efficacy and perceived social support status of working nurses during the outbreak of the COVID‐19 and investigate potential factors affecting their stress. Background The stress level of clinical nurses directly affects their physical and mental health and work efficiency. Design This study was a cross‐sectional investigation, which was performed following the STROBE checklist. The current study was conducted in February 2020 by selecting clinical nurses from the Zigong First People's Hospital for investigation. Methods At the peak of the COVID‐19 outbreak in China, we assessed clinical nurses with the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire, the General Self‐Efficacy Scale and the Perceived Social Support Scale. Specifically, the nurses were divided into three groups: (a) nurses supporting Wuhan; (b) nurses in the department of treating the COVID‐19 patients in our hospital (epidemic department); and (c) nurses in the general department without the COVID‐19 patients in our hospital (non‐epidemic department). Results A total of 1092 clinical nurses were surveyed with 94 nurses in Wuhan, 130 nurses treating COVID‐19 patients in our hospital and 868 nurses working without direct contact with diagnosed COVID‐19 patients. The mean stress score of all surveyed nurses was 33.15 (SD: 25.551). There was a statistically significant difference in stress response scores between different departments. Noticeably, the nurses who went to support in Wuhan showed a weaker stress response than the nurses who stayed in our hospital (mean: 19.98 (Wuhan) vs. 32.70 (epidemic department in our hospital) vs. 34.64 (non‐epidemic department in our hospital)). In addition, stress was negatively correlated with general self‐efficacy and perceived social support. Conclusion The present study suggested that the stress status of second‐line nurse without direct contact with diagnosed COVID‐19 patients was more severe than that of first‐line nurses who had direct contact with COVID‐19 patients. Relevance to clinical practice Our study indicated the importance of psychological status of second‐line medical staff during the global pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Changju Liao & Linghong Guo & Cuicui Zhang & Meiqi Zhang & Wenjing Jiang & Ying Zhong & Qingfang Lin & Yin Liu, 2021. "Emergency stress management among nurses: A lesson from the COVID‐19 outbreak in China–a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 433-442, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:433-442
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:433-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.