IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1372-1380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthy life styles, sleep and fatigue in endometrial cancer survivors: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Chia‐Hui Yu
  • Tsae‐Jyy Wang
  • Chih‐Long Chang
  • Shu‐Yuan Liang
  • Shu‐Fang Wu
  • Chieh‐Yu Liu
  • Yu Ying Lu

Abstract

Aims and objectives The primary aim of this study is to explore the influence of obesity, healthy lifestyle and sleep quality of endometrial cancer survivors on their fatigue level. Background As many as 30% of endometrial cancer survivors still suffer from fatigue 5 years after completing therapy. Fatigue may hinder cancer survivors from participating in daily activities or returning to their original roles and functions, thus affecting their health‐related quality of life. Design This study adopted a cross‐sectional correlational research design. The STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used as a reference for reporting the study. Methods A consecutive sample of 134 endometrial cancer survivors was recruited from the outpatient clinics of a medical centre in Taipei, Taiwan. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. Results Study subjects scored 44 points (SD = 7.09) on average for the fatigue levels. Results of linear regression showed that sleep quality (ß = −0.38), comorbidity index (ß = −0.024) and age (ß = 0.20) were important predictors of fatigue. However, differences in obesity, vegetable and fruit intake, physical activity did not lead to significant differences in fatigue level. Conclusions Survivors who had poorer sleep quality, higher comorbidity index and younger age reported higher fatigue. Relevance to clinical practice The study findings are relevant for assessing and preventing fatigue in endometrial cancer survivors. Those with poorer sleep quality, higher comorbidity index and younger age are at a greater risk for fatigue and deserve further attention. Although the study results failed to support the link between obesity, vegetable and fruit intake, physical activity and fatigue, the ratio of survivors who comply with recommended healthy lifestyles was low. Hence, it is of urgent necessity that this population receives the help to maintain a healthy lifestyle.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia‐Hui Yu & Tsae‐Jyy Wang & Chih‐Long Chang & Shu‐Yuan Liang & Shu‐Fang Wu & Chieh‐Yu Liu & Yu Ying Lu, 2020. "Healthy life styles, sleep and fatigue in endometrial cancer survivors: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1372-1380, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1372-1380
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15189
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Karl Ove Hufthammer & Margrethe Elin Vika, 2015. "Fatigue and quality of life in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers: a cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 546-555, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse & Gail Dunberger & Mette Linnet Olesen & Maria Østerbye & Lene Seibæk, 2019. "Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer—An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1393-1421, May.
    2. Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1372-1380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.