IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1162-1174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing home residents’ perspectives on their social relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Bada Kang
  • Kezia Scales
  • Eleanor S. McConnell
  • Yuting Song
  • Michael Lepore
  • Kirsten Corazzini

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nursing home residents’ perspectives on their relationships with other residents, family members and staff. Background The cultivation of social relationships is central to promoting well‐being in nursing homes, as these relationships allow residents, family members and staff to be valued as unique persons and empowered as partners in care. Few studies have examined how nursing home residents perceive the relationships in their social networks, both within and beyond the facility. Design Qualitative secondary analysis. Methods We analysed individual and group interviews obtained during “stakeholder engagement sessions” with cognitively intact residents (N = 11 sessions; N = 13 participants) from two nursing homes in North Carolina. The interviews were conducted as part of a larger study on person‐directed care planning. We integrated thematic and narrative analytic approaches to guide the analysis of interview data, using a three‐cycle coding approach. The COREQ checklist was followed. Results Four broad themes emerged from this analysis: (a) peer relationships foster a sense of belonging, purpose, achievement and significance; (b) residents’ relationships with family members support a sense of belonging, continuity and significance; (c) mutual respect and reciprocity between residents and nursing home staff promote a sense of belonging and significance; and (d) organisational factors pose barriers to forging meaningful relationships. Each type of relationship—peer, family and staff—made distinctive contributions residents’ psychosocial well‐being. Conclusion Recognising the diverse roles of different actors from residents’ social networks raises questions for future research to optimise the distinctive contributions of network members that promote residents’ psychosocial well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the need for nursing home staff to understand how residents’ social relationships influence residents’ psychosocial outcomes. Staff training programmes are needed to support residents’ rights and to dispel inaccurate interpretations of regulations that threaten sustained meaningful relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Bada Kang & Kezia Scales & Eleanor S. McConnell & Yuting Song & Michael Lepore & Kirsten Corazzini, 2020. "Nursing home residents’ perspectives on their social relationships," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1162-1174, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1162-1174
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15174
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tonya J Roberts, 2018. "Nursing home resident relationship types: What supports close relationships with peers & staff?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4361-4372, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1162-1174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.