IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1085-1093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An open‐label, randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of the Orve + wrap® versus Forced Air Warming in restoring normothermia in the postanaesthetic care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Smith
  • Caroline Abernethy
  • Victoria Allgar
  • Louise Foster
  • Victoria Martinson
  • Elizabeth Stones

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of the Orve + wrap® thermal blanket. Background Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is a common problem in postanaesthetic care units and can have significant effects on patients’ postoperative morbidity. Despite its commercial availability, there is no clinical evidence on the effectiveness of Orve + wrap®. Design A single centre prospective, open‐label, noninferiority randomised controlled trial. Methods Postoperative hypothermic (35.0–35.9°C) patients who had undergone elective surgery were randomised to receive either Orve + wrap® or Forced Air Warming during their PACU stay. Patient temperatures were recorded every 10 min using zero‐heat‐flux thermometry. This study is reported using CONSORT Extension checklist for noninferiority and equivalence trials. Results Between December 2016–October 2018, 129 patients were randomised to receive either Orve + wrap® blanket (n = 65, 50.3%) or Forced Air Warming (n = 64, 49.7%). The mean 60‐min postoperative temperature of patients receiving Orve + wrap® blanket was 36.2 and 36.3°C for the patients receiving Forced Air Warming. The predefined noninferiority margin of a mean difference in temperature of 0.3°C was not reached between the groups at 60 min. Additionally, there were no statistical differences between adverse event rates across these groups. Conclusions In the context of this study, warming patients with the Orve + wrap® was noninferior to Forced Air Warming. There were comparable rates of associated postoperative consequences of warming (shivering, hypotension, arrhythmias or surgical site infections), between the groups. Relevance to clinical practice The Orve + wrap® potentially provides an alternative warming method to Forced Air Warming for patients requiring short‐term postoperative warming. However, there are still a number of unknowns regarding the Orve + wrap® performance and further exploration is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Smith & Caroline Abernethy & Victoria Allgar & Louise Foster & Victoria Martinson & Elizabeth Stones, 2020. "An open‐label, randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of the Orve + wrap® versus Forced Air Warming in restoring normothermia in the postanaesthetic care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1085-1093, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1085-1093
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoonyoung Lee & Kisook Kim, 2021. "Optimal Application of Forced Air Warming to Prevent Peri-Operative Hypothermia during Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1085-1093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.