IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i5-6p863-871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Sage on the stage or guide on the side”—Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences and expectations of bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Koch
  • Lucie M. Ramjan
  • Bronwyn Everett
  • Anna Maceri
  • Kate Bell
  • Yenna Salamonson

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study sought to explore undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the role and value of their bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum. Background Blended learning approaches typically have reduced face‐to‐face contact with tutors—particularly in bioscience subjects which nursing students have traditionally found difficult, and the move to more web‐based learning resources may compound this difficulty. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods This qualitative study was conducted with 19 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in bioscience subjects, at a large university in outer metropolitan Sydney, Australia in 2016. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted over the telephone or face‐to‐face. Duration of interviews ranged from 13 to 71 min. Results were thematically analysed. EQUATOR guidelines for qualitative research (COREQ) applied. Results Two main themes with accompanying sub‐themes were identified. The first theme identified the importance of the tutor in bioscience, including their qualities, expertise and contextualisation of learning. The second theme provided insights into students’ perceptions of what they considered good and poor approaches to learning. Conclusions This study has clearly shown that while nursing students appreciated the flexibility offered by the online component of a blended learning curriculum, they still wanted an experienced bioscience tutor with clinical experience for their face‐to‐face classes. While the tutor was seen as crucial to providing clarification and context for content that was often challenging, they also played a key role in engaging and motivating students and creating a learning environment where students felt empowered to ask questions and debate issues with their peers. Given the increased use of online learning, further research could determine if the current study findings are also applicable in nonscience areas of study. Relevance to clinical practice The importance of students having a sound understanding of the biosciences for safe, effective clinical practice cannot be underestimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Koch & Lucie M. Ramjan & Bronwyn Everett & Anna Maceri & Kate Bell & Yenna Salamonson, 2020. "“Sage on the stage or guide on the side”—Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences and expectations of bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 863-871, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:863-871
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amelia Swift & Nikolaos Efstathiou & Paula Lameu, 2016. "Is LabTutor a helpful component of the blended learning approach to biosciences?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2683-2693, September.
    2. Tonks N. Fawcett & Anne Waugh & Graeme D. Smith, 2016. "Editorial: The primacy of the biosciences: a forgotten priority in nurse education?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2680-2682, September.
    3. Patricia Lynne Fell & Kerry Dobbins & Philip Dee, 2016. "Bioscience learning in clinical placement: the experiences of pre‐registration nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2694-2705, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanne Maria Bingen & Simen A. Steindal & Rune Johan Krumsvik & Bodil Tveit, 2020. "Studying physiology within a flipped classroom: The importance of on‐campus activities for nursing students’ experiences of mastery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2907-2917, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kari Toverud Jensen & Unni Knutstad & Tonks N. Fawcett, 2018. "The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1793-1802, May.
    2. Tonks N. Fawcett & Anne Waugh & Graeme D. Smith, 2016. "Editorial: The primacy of the biosciences: a forgotten priority in nurse education?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2680-2682, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:863-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.