IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i5-6p794-809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of an assessment tool for nursing workload in emergency departments

Author

Listed:
  • Steluta Iordache
  • Monique Elseviers
  • Rita De Cock
  • Bart Van Rompaey

Abstract

Aims To develop the Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) tool and to test its validity and reliability to measure nursing workload in the emergency departments. Background Ensuring safe nursing staffing in emergency departments is a worldwide concern. There is no valid tool to measure emergency nursing workload in order to determine the needed nurse staffing in the emergency departments. Design A two‐year, cross‐sectional, multicenter study. Methods Workload was operationalised as the time nurses spent with nursing activities, classified into direct and indirect care. A board of experts provided content validity. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the WANE's correlations and group‐discriminations patterns within the network of variables known to determine nursing workload. Reliability was assessed by the tool's ability to yield consistent results across repeated measurements. Reporting of this research adheres to STROBE guidelines. Results Seven emergency departments, including 3,024 patients, were involved in the first year and 18 emergency departments and 7,442 patients in the second year. Direct care time correlated positively and significantly with patient dependency on nursing care, age and length of emergency department stay and discriminated between the categories of dependency on nursing care, age and hospitalisation. Both direct and indirect care time discriminated between the emergency departments according to different patient care profiles and unit characteristics. WANE showed consistent results across measurements. Conclusions Results support the WANE's reliability and validity to measure emergency nursing workload. This tool could be used to determine, on patient and unit, a baseline nurse staffing and the nursing skill mix in the emergency departments. WANE is also an evidence‐based management tool for benchmarking purposes. Relevance to clinical practice The use of an evidence‐based workload tool in making staffing decisions in emergency departments is crucial to ensure safe patient care and prevent work overload in nursing staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Steluta Iordache & Monique Elseviers & Rita De Cock & Bart Van Rompaey, 2020. "Development and validation of an assessment tool for nursing workload in emergency departments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 794-809, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:794-809
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingo Gräff & Bernd Goldschmidt & Procula Glien & Sophia Klockner & Felix Erdfelder & Jennifer Lynn Schiefer & Daniel Grigutsch, 2016. "Nurse Staffing Calculation in the Emergency Department - Performance-Oriented Calculation Based on the Manchester Triage System at the University Hospital Bonn," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katja Janhunen & Päivi Kankkunen & Tarja Kvist, 2020. "Nurse staffing and care process factors in paediatric emergency department—An administrative data study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4554-4560, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:794-809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.