IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p503-510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distraction using virtual reality for children during intravenous injections in an emergency department: A randomised trial

Author

Listed:
  • Yen‐Ju Chen
  • Su‐Fen Cheng
  • Pi‐Chang Lee
  • Chi‐Hsiu Lai
  • I‐Ching Hou
  • Chi‐Wen Chen

Abstract

Aim and objectives To determine whether the virtual reality as a distracting intervention could reduce pain and fear in school‐age children receiving intravenous injections at an emergency department. Background An intravenous injection is the most common invasive procedure that paediatric patients encounter in emergency department. School‐age children seldom show their fear or discomfort during the procedure which may be ignored. Design A randomised controlled trial was conducted from December 2017–May 2018 and performed according to the CONSORT guidelines. Methods One hundred and thirty‐six children aged 7–12 years were randomly allocated to receive either a routine intravenous injection procedure or one with an immersive virtual reality experience. Children were asked to rate their pain and fear along with their caregivers and nurses on the Wong–Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and Children's Fear Scale, respectively. The time required for successful intravenous insertion was also assessed in the emergency department. Clinical trial registration was done (ClinicalTrials.gov.: NCT04081935). Results Pain and fear scores were significantly lower in the virtual reality group, as were the children's ratings as perceived by their caregivers and nurses. The children's ratings of pain and fear were positively correlated with the caregivers’ ratings and the nurses' ratings as well. The time required for successful intravenous insertion was significantly lower in the virtual reality group. Conclusion Visual reality intervention can effectively reduce the pain and fear during intravenous procedure in school‐age children in emergency department. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study indicate the feasible clinical value of virtual reality interventions during the administration of intravenous injections in school‐age children in emergency departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen‐Ju Chen & Su‐Fen Cheng & Pi‐Chang Lee & Chi‐Hsiu Lai & I‐Ching Hou & Chi‐Wen Chen, 2020. "Distraction using virtual reality for children during intravenous injections in an emergency department: A randomised trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 503-510, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:503-510
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diler Aydin & Nejla Canbulat Şahiner & Esra Karaca Çiftçi, 2016. "Comparison of the effectiveness of three different methods in decreasing pain during venipuncture in children: ball squeezing, balloon inflating and distraction cards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2328-2335, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gülçin Özalp Gerçeker & Dijle Ayar & Emine Zahide Özdemir & Murat Bektaş, 2020. "Effects of virtual reality on pain, fear and anxiety during blood draw in children aged 5–12 years old: A randomised controlled study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1151-1161, April.
    2. Tulay Basak & Senem Duman & Ayla Demirtas, 2020. "Distraction‐based relief of pain associated with peripheral intravenous catheterisation in adults: a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 770-777, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:503-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.