IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p416-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for nurses when communicating with people who have life‐limiting illness and their families: A focus group study

Author

Listed:
  • Debra Kerr
  • Sharyn Milnes
  • Jette Ammentorp
  • Claire McKie
  • Trisha Dunning
  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz
  • Maiken Wolderslund
  • Peter Martin

Abstract

Aims and objectives The proposed study aimed to answer the following question: What communication issues do nurses find challenging when caring for people with life‐limiting illness? Background Evidence suggests that attitudes, skills and knowledge about how nurses communicate effectively with patients and their families could be improved. However, the literature predominantly focuses on nurses working in oncology and the medical profession. Design A qualitative descriptive design was used. Methods Focus groups were conducted with 39 nurses from three wards within a regional healthcare organisation in Victoria, Australia. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to document reporting of the study. Results In their view, nurses have the potential to develop a strong bond with patients and their families. Three key themes were identified: (a) feeling unskilled to have difficult conversations with patients who have life‐limiting illness; (b) interacting with family members adds complexity to care of patients who have life‐limiting illness; and (c) organisational factors impede nurses' capacity to have meaningful conversations with patients and their families. Conclusions Caring for individuals with life‐limiting illness is complex and often occurs in an emotionally charged environment. However, nurses report being hampered by time restraints and lack of information about the patient's condition and goals of care. Limitations in conversation structure and a comprehensive range of core communication skills affect their ability to confidently engage in conversations, particularly when they are responding to prognostic questions. Relevance to clinical practice Whilst nurses are responsible for performing technical skills, they can maximise care by developing a trusting relationship with patients and their relatives. Increased acuity limits the time nurses have to talk with patients. In addition, they lack confidence to deal with difficult questions. Specific training may increase nurses' confidence and efficiency when communicating with patients and their families.

Suggested Citation

  • Debra Kerr & Sharyn Milnes & Jette Ammentorp & Claire McKie & Trisha Dunning & Joan Ostaszkiewicz & Maiken Wolderslund & Peter Martin, 2020. "Challenges for nurses when communicating with people who have life‐limiting illness and their families: A focus group study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 416-428, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:416-428
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Brault & Kelley Kilpatrick & Danielle D’Amour & Damien Contandriopoulos & Véronique Chouinard & Carl-Ardy Dubois & Mélanie Perroux & Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, 2014. "Role Clarification Processes for Better Integration of Nurse Practitioners into Primary Healthcare Teams: A Multiple-Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Kusi‐Appiah & Sherry Dahlke & Sarah Stahlke, 2018. "Nursing care providers’ perceptions on their role contributions in patient care: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3830-3845, November.
    2. Milad Mirbabaie & Stefan Stieglitz & Nicholas R. J. Frick, 2021. "Hybrid intelligence in hospitals: towards a research agenda for collaboration," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 365-387, June.
    3. Elyne De Baetselier & Bart Van Rompaey & Nienke E. Dijkstra & Carolien G. Sino & Kevin Akerman & Luis M. Batalha & Maria I. D. Fernandez & Izabela Filov & Vigdis A. Grøndahl & Jana Heczkova & Ann Kari, 2021. "The NUPHAC-EU Framework for Nurses’ Role in Interprofessional Pharmaceutical Care: Cross-Sectional Evaluation in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Andrea Iriarte‐Roteta & Olga Lopez‐Dicastillo & Agurtzane Mujika & Cayetana Ruiz‐Zaldibar & Naia Hernantes & Elena Bermejo‐Martins & María J. Pumar‐Méndez, 2020. "Nurses’ role in health promotion and prevention: A critical interpretive synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 3937-3949, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:416-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.