IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4708-4719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting hospital outcomes with the reported edmonton frail scale‐Thai version in orthopaedic older patients

Author

Listed:
  • Inthira Roopsawang
  • Hilaire Thompson
  • Oleg Zaslavsky
  • Basia Belza

Abstract

Aims and objectives To test the ability of the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale‐Thai version to predict hospital outcomes compared with standard preoperative assessment measures (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure) in older Thai orthopaedic patients. Background Frailty is a common geriatric condition. No previous studies have assessed frailty among orthopaedic patients in Thailand. Effective frailty screening could enhance quality of care. Design Prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Methods Two hundred hospitalised patients, aged 60 years or older and scheduled for orthopaedic surgery, participated in the study. Frailty was evaluated using the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale‐Thai version. Multiple Firth logistic regression was used to model the effect of frailty on postoperative complications, postoperative delirium and discharge disposition. Length of stay was examined using Poisson regression. Comparing predictability of the instruments, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and mean squared errors were evaluated. The STROBE guideline was used. Results Participants’ mean age was 72 years; mostly were female, frail and underwent knee, spine and/or hip surgery. Poor health outcomes including postoperative complications, postoperative delirium, and not being discharged to the home were commonly identified. The length of stay varied from three days to more than ten weeks. Frailty was significantly associated with postoperative complications, postoperative delirium and prolonged length of stay. The Reported Edmonton Frail Scale‐Thai version revealed good performance for predicting postoperative complications and postoperative delirium and was improved by combining with standard assessments. Conclusion The Reported Edmonton Frail Scale‐Thai version, alone or combined with standard assessment, was useful for predicting adverse outcomes in older adults undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Relevance to clinical practice These findings indicate that nurse professionals should apply culturally sensitive frailty screening to proactively identify patients’ risk of frailty, improve care quality and prevent adverse outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Inthira Roopsawang & Hilaire Thompson & Oleg Zaslavsky & Basia Belza, 2020. "Predicting hospital outcomes with the reported edmonton frail scale‐Thai version in orthopaedic older patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4708-4719, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4708-4719
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4708-4719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.