IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4331-4342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Describing objectively measured intensive care nurses’ physical work activity behavioural patterns during a 12‐hr shift

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Yu
  • Anantha Narayanan
  • Lisa Mackay
  • Kim Ward
  • Anna King
  • Melody Smith

Abstract

Aim and objectives To describe intensive care unit (ICU) nurses’ physical work activity behavioural patterns over 12 hr using dual accelerometry, following a job demands–recovery framework. Background Limited studies utilised accelerometry to objectively analyse nurses’ physical workloads. Little is known about intensive care nurses’ physical activity patterns during a 12‐hr shift. Design A cross‐sectional study was conducted with intensive care nurses from four units in Auckland, New Zealand. Methods Each participant wore two Axivity AX3 accelerometers to measure physical activity during a 12‐hr day or night shift. An online survey captured participants’ demographic information. R software (version 3.6.1) and SPSS version 26 were utilised for data analysis. The STROBE was followed. Results A total of 102 nurses were included in this study. A high level of light intensity activity behaviours (standing, dynamic standing, walking) was observed throughout the day shifts, with no higher intensity behaviours identified. Activity levels were highest at the beginning of shifts and followed a consistent pattern, with an additional peak around midday for day shifts and at the end of the shift for night shifts. Observable differences were seen between day and night shifts with a greater prevalence of sitting and lying during night shifts. Standing, dynamic standing, sitting, lying and walking were significant factors in the differences of the physical work behaviours between the day shift nurses and the night shift nurses. Significant differences in dynamic standing and lying were found between ICUs. Conclusions Intensive care nurses’ physical work activity involved a large amount of standing and dynamic standing during a 12‐hr shift. The overall physical workload during a 12‐hr day shift was significantly higher than that during a 12‐hr night shift. Relevance to clinical practice Results may help managers attain a better understanding of nurses’ physical workloads during a 12‐hr shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Yu & Anantha Narayanan & Lisa Mackay & Kim Ward & Anna King & Melody Smith, 2020. "Describing objectively measured intensive care nurses’ physical work activity behavioural patterns during a 12‐hr shift," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4331-4342, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4331-4342
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona Yu & Alana Cavadino & Lisa Mackay & Kim Ward & Anna King & Melody Smith, 2020. "Physical activity and personal factors associated with nurse resilience in intensive care units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3246-3262, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Svein Barene & Peter Krustrup, 2022. "Football and Zumba Training in Female Hospital Staff: Effects after 12 and 40 Weeks on Self-Reported Health Status, Emotional Wellbeing, General Self-Efficacy and Sleep Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4331-4342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.