IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4057-4065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the hand hygiene beliefs and practices of nursing students and the effectiveness of their handwashing behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Burcu Ceylan
  • Ulku Gunes
  • Leyla Baran
  • Huri Ozturk
  • Gul Sahbudak

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the hand hygiene beliefs and practices of Turkish nursing students and the effectiveness of their handwashing. Background Handwashing is the most important part of preventing cross‐infection, but there is a considerable amount of evidence that shows that the handwashing technique of nurses and nursing students is not always very effective. Design/Methods This research was carried out in two stages and is type of descriptive, analytical and observational. The study comprised 563 students from a Faculty of Nursing. Besides evaluating the nursing students' sociodemographic data, we assessed their beliefs and hand hygiene practices using a Hand Hygiene Beliefs Scale (HHBS) and Hand Hygiene Practices Inventory (HHPI) and also used with “Derma LiteCheck” device to assess how effectively they washed their hands. The STROBE checklist was used. Results The handwashing frequency of the female students was significantly higher. The scores on both the HHBS and the HHPI were significantly higher among the female students compared to the males. The dirtiest areas of the hand were determined as nails (nail beds, beneath the nails), skin between the fingers and fingertips. Conclusions The results of our study indicate that although student nurses have positive perceptions about hand hygiene and appear to have developed good habits, the effectiveness of their handwashing is poor. Relevance to clinical practice It is of great importance that UV light and florescent gel are made readily available both at nursing schools and in hospitals and other health institutions since these elements are useful in providing immediate visual feedback for a full assessment of handwashing behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Burcu Ceylan & Ulku Gunes & Leyla Baran & Huri Ozturk & Gul Sahbudak, 2020. "Examining the hand hygiene beliefs and practices of nursing students and the effectiveness of their handwashing behaviour," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4057-4065, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4057-4065
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15430
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Gázquez-López & Encarnación Martínez-García & Adelina Martín-Salvador & María Adelaida Álvarez-Serrano & Inmaculada García-García & Rafael A. Caparros-Gonzalez & María Ángeles Pérez-Morente, 2021. "Posters as a Tool to Improve Hand Hygiene among Health Science Students: Case—Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Agnieszka Gniadek & Beata Ogórek-Tęcza & Anna Inglot & Anna Nowacka & Agnieszka Micek, 2021. "Hand Areas Which Are Commonly Missed during Hand Disinfection by Nursing Students Who Completed a Basic Educational Course in Hand Hygiene," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4057-4065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.