IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4030-4044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing student–patient relationship and related factors—A self‐assessment by nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Arja Suikkala
  • Helena Leino‐Kilpi
  • Jouko Katajisto
  • Sanna Koskinen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the nursing student–patient relationship in terms of three types of relationships—mechanistic, authoritative and facilitative—and analyse the factors related to the type of relationship. Background As future professionals, nursing students have a central role in facilitating patient autonomy while working in partnership with patients. Supporting student–patient relationship throughout the nursing education may result in positive outcomes for both students and patients. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods The data were collected from a convenience sample of Finnish nursing students using a structured web survey. Statistical data analysis was performed using chi‐square test, two‐sample t test, one‐way analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regression. The STROBE Statement — Checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used (Appendix S1). Results Students most often assessed their relationship with the patients as facilitative, followed by authoritative and mechanistic relationships. The results revealed three predictors for facilitative relationship: students’ older age, long enough contact time with the patient and higher competence in ensuring quality. In authoritative and facilitative relationships, students had significantly more positive perceptions of the contextual factors and consequences of the relationship and higher ratings of self‐assessed competence levels than students in a mechanistic relationship. Conclusions It seems that the facilitative student–patient relationship is connected to the professional competence of nursing students, especially in the area of ensuring the quality of patient care. Therefore, sustaining clinical learning environments and pedagogical approaches that value and support facilitative relationships in students’ clinical learning should be enhanced. Relevance to clinical practice Efforts aimed at contributing to facilitative student–patient relationships have a crucial role in shaping students’ competency and in promoting high‐quality patient care. Thus, supervision of students organised around establishing mutual student–patient relationships with the preceptors acting as facilitators will benefit both students and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Arja Suikkala & Helena Leino‐Kilpi & Jouko Katajisto & Sanna Koskinen, 2020. "Nursing student–patient relationship and related factors—A self‐assessment by nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4030-4044, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4030-4044
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15426
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janet Scammell & Vanessa Heaslip & Emma Crowley, 2016. "Service user involvement in preregistration general nurse education: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 53-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyung Im Kang & Jaewon Joung, 2020. "Outcomes of Consumer Involvement in Mental Health Nursing Education: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4030-4044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.