IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i17-18p3154-3169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of flexible sacrum positions during the second stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zang
  • Hong Lu
  • Yang Zhao
  • Jing Huang
  • Lihua Ren
  • Xia Li

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the effects of flexible sacrum positions on mode of delivery, duration of the second stage of labour, perineal trauma, postpartum haemorrhage, maternal pain, abnormal foetal heart rate patterns and Apgar scores based on published literature. Background Maternal positions served as a nonmedical intervention may facilitate optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes during labour. Flexible sacrum positions are conducive to expanding pelvic outlet. Whether flexible sacrum positions have positive effects on maternal and neonatal well‐being is a controversial issue under heated discussion. Design We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis based on PRISMA guidelines. Methods Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any flexible sacrum position with non‐flexible sacrum position in the second stage of labour were included. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), SinoMed and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to 11 March 2019 for published RCTs. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane criteria, and random‐effects meta‐analyses were conducted by RevMan 5.3. Results Sixteen studies (3,397 women) published in English were included. Flexible sacrum positions in the second stage of labour could reduce the incidence of operative delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, caesarean section, episiotomy, severe perineal trauma, severe pain and shorten the duration of active pushing phase in the second stage of labour. However, flexible sacrum positions may increase the incidence of mild perineal trauma. There was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage of labour, maternal satisfaction and other outcomes. Conclusions Flexible sacrum positions are superior in promoting maternal well‐being during childbirth. However, several results require careful interpretation. More rigorous original studies are needed to further explore their effects. Relevance to clinical practice The results support the use of flexible sacrum positions. Flexible sacrum positions are recommended to apply flexibly or tailor to individual woman's labour progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zang & Hong Lu & Yang Zhao & Jing Huang & Lihua Ren & Xia Li, 2020. "Effects of flexible sacrum positions during the second stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3154-3169, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3154-3169
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3154-3169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.