IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2410-2419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved quality of care by using the PRISMS form to support self‐management in patients with COPD: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Ann‐Britt Zakrisson
  • Mats Arne
  • Karin Lisspers
  • Lena Lundh
  • Hanna Sandelowsky
  • Björn Ställberg
  • Eva Thors Adolfsson
  • Kersti Theander

Abstract

Aims and objective To investigate the effects on the quality of care of the Patient Report Informing Self‐Management Support (PRISMS) form compared with usual care among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) consulting a COPD nurse in primary health care. Background Patients with COPD experience symptoms affecting their everyday lives, and there is a need for interventions in self‐management support. The delivery of chronic care in an organised, structured and planned manner can lead to more productive relationships between professionals and patients. Design A multicentre randomised controlled trial with a post‐test design, according to the CONSORT checklist, in one intervention group (n = 94) and one control group (n = 108). Methods In addition to usual care, the intervention group (n = 94) completed the PRISMS form to indicate areas where they wanted self‐management support before the consultation with the COPD nurse. This form comprises 17 items that patients with COPD commonly experience as problems. The control group received usual care (n = 108). The primary outcome was patients’ satisfaction with quality of care, assessed using the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. Means and (SD) are presented where applicable. Differences between the intervention and control group were analysed with Student's t test for independent groups for interval data, and the Mann–Whitney U test for ordinal data. Results Participants in the intervention group were more satisfied with the QPP domains “personal attention,” regarding both “perceived reality” (p = .021) and “subjective importance” (p = .012). The PRISMS form revealed “shortness of breath” as the most commonly experienced problem and the issue most desired to discuss. Conclusion The PRISMS form improved patient satisfaction with quality of care regarding personal attention, which is an important factor in patient participation and improving relationships and communication. Relevance to clinical practice The PRISMS form can be a useful tool in improving person‐centred care when delivering self‐management support. Register Id 192691 at http://www.researchweb.org/is/en/sverige/project/192691.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann‐Britt Zakrisson & Mats Arne & Karin Lisspers & Lena Lundh & Hanna Sandelowsky & Björn Ställberg & Eva Thors Adolfsson & Kersti Theander, 2020. "Improved quality of care by using the PRISMS form to support self‐management in patients with COPD: A Randomised Controlled Trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2410-2419, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2410-2419
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lilas Ali & Andreas Fors & Inger Ekman, 2018. "Need of support in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1089-1096, March.
    2. Irene Bos-Touwen & Marieke Schuurmans & Evelyn M Monninkhof & Yvonne Korpershoek & Lotte Spruit-Bentvelzen & Inge Ertugrul-van der Graaf & Niek de Wit & Jaap Trappenburg, 2015. "Patient and Disease Characteristics Associated with Activation for Self-Management in Patients with Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Heart Failure and Chronic Renal Disease: A ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cynthia F. Corbett & Kenn B. Daratha & Sterling McPherson & Crystal L. Smith & Michael S. Wiser & Brenda K. Vogrig & Sean M. Murphy & Roy Cantu & Dennis G. Dyck, 2021. "Patient Activation, Depressive Symptoms, and Self-Rated Health: Care Management Intervention Effects among High-Need, Medically Complex Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Dorota Włodarczyk & Joanna Chylińska, 2022. "Profiles of Health-Related Patient Activation and Their Determinants: The Results of a Cluster Analysis of Older Adults—Conclusions for Patient Counselling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Bischof, Anja, 2023. "The power of knowledge: A survey on COPD patients' health literacy in Switzerland," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2023-04, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Healthcare Management.
    4. Tomoko Kamei & Yuko Yamamoto & Takuya Kanamori & Yuki Nakayama & Sarah E. Porter, 2018. "Detection of early‐stage changes in people with chronic diseases: A telehome monitoring‐based telenursing feasibility study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 313-322, September.
    5. Uday Narayan Yadav & Jane Lloyd & Hassan Hosseinzadeh & Kedar Prasad Baral & Narendra Bhatta & Mark Fort Harris, 2020. "Levels and determinants of health literacy and patient activation among multi-morbid COPD people in rural Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2410-2419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.