IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2397-2409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling safe with patient‐controlled admissions: A grounded theory study of the mental health patients' experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Trine Ellegaard
  • Vibeke Bliksted
  • Mimi Mehlsen
  • Kirsten Lomborg

Abstract

Aim To develop a grounded theory of the patients' experiences with patient‐controlled admission. Background Research indicates a potential for involving patients in mental health care, but there is a need to develop and investigate new approaches in health services. Patient‐controlled admission is an option for patients with severe mental disorders to refer themselves for a brief hospital admission when needed and thus avoid the usual admission procedure. Design Classic grounded theory with generation of a theory based on the constant comparative method for data collection and analysis. Methods Field observations and interviews with 26 mental health patients. The COREQ checklist was followed. Results We found that patient‐controlled admission induced safety by providing faster access to help and thus preventing further deterioration of symptoms. Being self‐determined, achieving calmness and receiving care with support and guidance from professionals during admission contributed to the sense of safety. The familiarity with the mental health professionals in their related units supported the patients in managing their situation. On the other hand, feelings of being overlooked by the professionals and experiencing uncertainty could undermine patients' feeling of safety. Conclusions We demonstrate that safety is a focal point for patients when receiving help and support in mental health care. Patient‐controlled admission can induce a feeling of safety both at the hospital and at home. Patients' self‐determination is strengthened, and brief admissions give them an opportunity to handle what they are currently struggling with. Professionals can support patients in this, but their actions can also reduce patients’ feeling of safety. Relevance to clinical practice Patient involvement can be introduced in psychiatry, and even severely ill patients seem to be able to assess their own condition. Feasibility may, however, be associated with the attitude and behaviour of the professionals in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Trine Ellegaard & Vibeke Bliksted & Mimi Mehlsen & Kirsten Lomborg, 2020. "Feeling safe with patient‐controlled admissions: A grounded theory study of the mental health patients' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2397-2409, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2397-2409
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ching‐Yun Yu & Chien Yu Lai & Yu‐Shan Chang & Ching‐Kuan Wu & Feng‐Chin Chung, 2019. "The symptoms, resourcefulness and quality of life in community‐based patients with schizophrenia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3582-3589, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2397-2409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.