IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i11-12p1774-1787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding the fundamental needs behind resistance to care: Using the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Rey
  • Philippe Voyer
  • Suzanne Bouchard
  • Camille Savoie

Abstract

A person living with Alzheimer's disease (PA) can experience difficulty during bodily care and therefore may show resistance to care behaviours (RTCBs). Nurses must take a clinical approach to planning care that meets the person’s needs. Therefore, it is necessary to identify training strategies for bedside nurses and nursing students. Aims and objectives To describe and discuss how the FOC practice process (FOC‐PP) can help nurses understand PAs who show RTCBs during bodily care. Background Resistance to care behaviour phenomenon and the importance of bodily care as fundamental care are described. The FOC‐PP enables nurses to apply the FOC framework in their practice. Design This discursive paper is based on the literature of the FOC framework and PP. Method A clinical scenario that develops through the five stages of the FOC‐PP. Results The scenario centres on Mrs. Emily Morgan, 81, who lives in a nursing home and is not receiving the bodily care that she needs. Camille, a nursing student, and her supervisor Florence collaborate with Mrs. Morgan’s family to improve the quality of her care. Three particular aspects of nursing practice based on the FOC‐PP are described: the critical thinking process, relational process and pedagogical process. Conclusion The FOC‐PP promotes holistic care centred on the person and his or her needs and encourages the nurse to use his or her skills and knowledge. All these dimensions are fundamental for high‐quality nursing care. Relevance to clinical practice Mrs. Morgan's scenario enables us to perceive that the FOC‐PP is very useful for nursing students and bedside nurses. However, given the amount of specific and diverse knowledge required by the FOC‐PP, it is necessary to identify avenues for teaching them. Using clinical scenarios could facilitate the integration of the FOC‐PP, with taking into account the specific characteristics of individual clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Rey & Philippe Voyer & Suzanne Bouchard & Camille Savoie, 2020. "Finding the fundamental needs behind resistance to care: Using the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1774-1787, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1774-1787
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2018. "Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2230-2247, June.
    2. Tiffany Conroy, 2018. "Factors influencing the delivery of the fundamentals of care: Perceptions of nurses, nursing leaders and healthcare consumers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2373-2386, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eva Jangland & Noeman Mirza & Tiffany Conroy & Clair Merriman & Emiko Suzui & Akiko Nishimura & Ann Ewens, 2018. "Nursing students' understanding of the Fundamentals of Care: A cross‐sectional study in five countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2460-2472, June.
    2. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Matteo Danielis, 2021. "To what extent Unfinished Nursing Care tools coincide with the discrete elements of The Fundamentals of Care Framework? A comparative analysis based on a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 239-265, January.
    3. Abigail Affiong Mkperedem & Peter Ogunlade & Chisaa Igbolekwu & Ogadimma Arisukwu & Abiodun Olawale Afolabi & Ruth Adefunke Adedayo, 2023. "Healthcare service delivery perception among NHIS-HMO enrollees in Lagos hospitals," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Lone Jørgensen & Susanne Kastrup Jensen & Bettina Brogaard, 2020. "Situational awareness in the outpatient encounter between patients with breast cancer or malignant melanoma and healthcare professionals: Patients’ perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1981-1990, June.
    5. Elise van Belle & Jeltje Giesen & Tiffany Conroy & Marloes van Mierlo & Hester Vermeulen & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Maud Heinen, 2020. "Exploring person‐centred fundamental nursing care in hospital wards: A multi‐site ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1933-1944, June.
    6. Alison Kitson, 2018. "Moving on…," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2175-2176, June.
    7. Nurfika Asmaningrum & Dini Kurniawati & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2020. "Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 899-908, March.
    8. Cathleen Aspinall & Jenny M. Parr & Julia Slark & Denise Wilson, 2020. "The culture conversation: Report from the 2nd Australasian ILC meeting—Auckland 2019," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1768-1773, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:11-12:p:1774-1787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.