IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i7-8p1242-1250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach of assessing patient safety aspects in routine practice using the example of “doctors handwritten prescriptions”

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald Sendlhofer
  • Gudrun Pregartner
  • Veronika Gombotz
  • Karina Leitgeb
  • Peter Tiefenbacher
  • Lydia Jantscher
  • Christian Richter
  • Magdalena Hoffmann
  • Lars P. Kamolz
  • Gernot Brunner

Abstract

Aims and objectives To test the method of self‐ and external assessment as a feedback system to decrease illegibility and incorrectness of handwritten prescriptions and to reduce additional workload for nursing staff. Background Illegibility and incorrectness of handwritten prescriptions occur very often and are the most crucial factors affecting patient safety. Design Self‐ versus external assessment using a 15 items checklist. Methods Nurses randomly selected five fever charts of their wards. Each fever chart was self‐ as well as externally assessed. Nurses and doctors took part in the self‐assessment, and the external assessment was performed by external experts. According to a monitor suspension system, assessment results were considered “green,” “yellow” or “red.” After the first assessment and issuing feedback of the results “red” scored wards by the external assessment, additional trainings were performed. Thereafter, a second assessment was performed to rate eligibility and completeness of prescriptions. The research and reporting methodology followed squire 2.0. Results In total, 580 fever charts were self‐ as well as externally assessed (290 in each of the two assessment periods). Out of the 58 participating wards, 31 were surgical and 27 were non‐surgical wards. Averaging over all checklist items, surgical and non‐surgical wards improved only slightly over time. Linear regression models for ward means showed that there were significant improvements over time for non‐surgical wards. Conclusions This method directly involves those who commit errors and stimulate learning from errors. The approach of self‐ and external assessment was a useful instrument to detect inadequate prescriptions and to monitor improvements. Relevance to clinical practice Significant improvements were achieved regarding correctness and legibility of handwritten prescription and helped to decrease additional workload for nursing staff and thereby enhanced patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald Sendlhofer & Gudrun Pregartner & Veronika Gombotz & Karina Leitgeb & Peter Tiefenbacher & Lydia Jantscher & Christian Richter & Magdalena Hoffmann & Lars P. Kamolz & Gernot Brunner, 2019. "A new approach of assessing patient safety aspects in routine practice using the example of “doctors handwritten prescriptions”," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1242-1250, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1242-1250
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1242-1250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.