IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i7-8p1125-1134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radiographers’ experience of risks for patient safety incidents in the radiology department

Author

Listed:
  • Agneta Wallin
  • Margareta Gustafsson
  • Agneta Anderzen Carlsson
  • Maud Lundén

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe potential risks for patient safety incidents in the radiology department from a radiographer's perspective. Background A radiology department is a high‐tech environment with high communication activity between different healthcare systems in combination with a large patient flow. Risks for patient safety incidents exist in every phase of a radiological examination. Due to the nature of the activity, a radiology department needs to have its own range of measures to prevent risks linked to radiology. Design A qualitative descriptive design. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were carried out with 17 radiographers during the period September 2015 to February 2016. The data were analysed using conventional content analysis. This study followed the COREQ checklist criteria for the reporting of qualitative research. Results The analysis yielded 20 different patient safety incidents that could result in the following six types of healthcare‐associated harm: Patients could be exposed to unnecessary radiation; patients could receive an inaccurate diagnosis; patients could incur drug‐induced damage; patients could suffer direct physical injury; or, their examination and treatment could be delayed or not carried out; or, their general health condition could deteriorate. Conclusion Lack of communication and knowledge, both internally and externally, can increase risks for patient safety incidents. The study describes a complex chain of activities that represent risks in the radiology department. It needs to be pointed out that it is not always the activities in the radiology department that cause the harm. Relevance to clinical practice To carry out preventive patient safety work, a comprehensive analysis of the entire care chain is required. Patient safety work should also focus on improvement in communication both internally, within the radiology department, and externally. Standardised methodological guidelines, consistent prescriptions of method from the radiologist and a good working environment are internal success factors for patient safety at the radiology department.

Suggested Citation

  • Agneta Wallin & Margareta Gustafsson & Agneta Anderzen Carlsson & Maud Lundén, 2019. "Radiographers’ experience of risks for patient safety incidents in the radiology department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1125-1134, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1125-1134
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1125-1134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.