IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p3866-3878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disability, emotional distress and well‐being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Hui‐Chen Hsu
  • Chih‐Ju Chang
  • Heng‐Hsin Tung
  • Tsae‐Jyy Wang

Abstract

Aim and objective To explore the disability, emotional distress and well‐being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Background Few studies have investigated the correlations between disability, emotional distress and well‐being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Design This study used a cross‐sectional research design. Methods Participants were 133 patients aged over 50 years who were experiencing lumbar spondylolisthesis. The research instruments included a demographic information questionnaire; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); the Chinese versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory‐State (STAI‐S) and Center for Epidemiological Study‐Depression (CES‐D); and the Psychological Well‐being (PWB) Scale. Emotional distress was measured by the STAI‐S and CES‐D. Pearson's correlations coefficient, multiple linear regression and a mediating effect model were introduced to explore correlations between the variables and predictors of psychological well‐being, and details of the methods are reported in coherence to STROBE criteria. Results Eighty‐six participants (64.6%) had moderate and severe anxiety, and 42 (31.6%) experienced depression. Participants reported medium to high levels of well‐being; “satisfaction with interpersonal relationships” was rated the highest and “physical and mental health” the lowest. Disability, depression and anxiety had significant negative correlations with well‐being. Depression and anxiety mediated the relationship between disability and well‐being. Moreover, depression, family support, educational background and anxiety were predictors of well‐being, accounting for 39.1% of the total variance. Conclusions Disability and emotional distress among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis had a negative impact on well‐being. Anxiety and depression were closely correlated with and substantially influenced well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice Health professionals will enhance the understanding of important factors influencing well‐being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. This study suggests the conduct of depression and anxiety evaluations at outpatient clinics and prior to surgery, so that clinicians will be aware of the emotional distress status of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and, therefore, enhance their well‐being.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui‐Chen Hsu & Chih‐Ju Chang & Heng‐Hsin Tung & Tsae‐Jyy Wang, 2019. "Disability, emotional distress and well‐being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3866-3878, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3866-3878
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grażyna Guzy & Romuald Polczyk & Malwina Szpitalak & Howard Vernon, 2016. "Age Moderates the Relationships between Family Functioning and Neck Pain/Disability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3866-3878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.