IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p3776-3785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construct validity and reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by aneurysm rupture

Author

Listed:
  • HyunSoo Oh
  • SeonYoung Shin
  • SooHyun Kim
  • WhaSook Seo

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed at examining the construct validity and reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by aneurysm rupture. Background The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score is known to be a valid and reliable consciousness assessment tool and provides comprehensive information not given by the Glasgow Coma Scale. However, the validity and reliability of this tool have not been tested in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Design A nonexperimental, descriptive, correlational study design was adopted. Methods The STROBE statement was used for reporting this study. The study participants were 72 patients with spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by aneurysm rupture, admitted to an intensive care unit in a university hospital between August 2016–July 2017. Data on demographic characteristics, Hunt–Hess clinical stage scores, Fisher CT stage scores, disease‐related characteristics, Full Outline of UnResponsiveness scores and 1‐month Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were subjected to analysis. Results Full Outline of UnResponsiveness scores were found to have significant correlations with scores on Hunt–Hess clinical or Fisher CT stage tool and adequately predict 1‐month recovery. This tool also exhibited excellent inter‐rater agreement and internal consistency. Conclusions The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score is valid and reliable for consciousness evaluation in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. It has been believed that use of this tool may help prevent negative consequences arising from impaired consciousness and improve the outcomes of patients with spontaneous aneurysmatic subarachnoid haemorrhage. Relevance to clinical practice The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score is a consciousness assessment tool that provides more neurological detail because it includes consideration of brainstem reflexes, visual tracking, breathing patterns and respiratory drive, and can be applied in cases of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage and other types of brain injury, especially in patients with severe consciousness impairment.

Suggested Citation

  • HyunSoo Oh & SeonYoung Shin & SooHyun Kim & WhaSook Seo, 2019. "Construct validity and reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by aneurysm rupture," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3776-3785, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3776-3785
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3776-3785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.