IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2946-2952.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' perceptions of pain management adequacy in mechanically ventilated patients

Author

Listed:
  • Oren Asman
  • Elena Slutsker
  • Semyon Melnikov

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine how nurses' knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients and self‐perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians affects the adequacy of departmental pain management. Background Pain management is a vital factor of medical treatment in a hospital setting. Inadequate pain management requires attention both from a patient‐focused perspective and from a departmental one. It would be particularly troubling in the case of inadequate pain management of mechanically ventilated patients. Design The study utilised a cross‐sectional design. The instruments developed were validated by a focus group of 25 pain management nurses, who reviewed the questionnaire for face validity, feasibility and comprehensibility, and who did not participate in the study. The questionnaire was revised, readjusted and formulated based on their responses and comments. Methods A self‐administered questionnaire administered in Israel with a convenience sample of 187 registered nurses (RN) from internal medicine and surgical departments and ICUs. Data were collected during February–May 2015. The “STROBE” EQUATOR checklist was used. Results Nurses working in the ICU scored significantly higher on knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients and on self‐perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians. Self‐perceived collaboration between physicians and nurses was positively correlated with perceived departmental pain treatment adequacy. Self‐perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians, knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients and seniority (with a borderline significance) explained 27% of the variance of perceived departmental pain management. Conclusion Nurses' knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients, as well as self‐perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians, promotes reported adequate pain management. Relevance to clinical practice Pain management would benefit from being conducted as a well‐performed interprofessional self‐perceived collaborative practice. Knowledgeable nurses tend to critically assess the level of departmental pain management.

Suggested Citation

  • Oren Asman & Elena Slutsker & Semyon Melnikov, 2019. "Nurses' perceptions of pain management adequacy in mechanically ventilated patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2946-2952, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2946-2952
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14896
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsiang‐Ling Wang & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2010. "Nurses’ knowledge and barriers regarding pain management in intensive care units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3188-3196, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilde Wøien & Henning Værøy & Geir Aamodt & Ida T Bjørk, 2014. "Improving the systematic approach to pain and sedation management in the ICU by using assessment tools," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1552-1561, June.
    2. Esther I. Bernhofer & Jeanne M. Sorrell, 2015. "Nurses Managing Patients’ Pain May Experience Moral Distress," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 24(4), pages 401-414, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2946-2952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.