IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2934-2945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse practitioner primary care organizational climate questionnaire: Item response theory and differential item functioning

Author

Listed:
  • Lusine Poghosyan
  • Affan Ghaffari
  • Jonathan Shaffer

Abstract

Aims and objectives To validate Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire (NP‐PCOCQ) items using item response theory (IRT) models and conduct differential item functioning (DIF) analysis to test the item functioning among nurse practitioners (NPs) practicing in different U.S. states with variable regulations governing NP practice. Background Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire is the only NP‐specific tool measuring NP work environment and is being used in different U.S. states with variable NP scope of practice regulations and internationally to produce evidence about NP work environments within their organisations. Design Cross‐sectional survey design was used to collect data from 278 primary care NPs in New York (NY) and 314 NPs in Massachusetts (MA). Methods NPs completed the 29‐item NP‐PCOCQ. Data collection involved an online survey in NY and a mail survey in MA in 2012. We used Samejima's graded response model for IRT and ordinal logistic regression for DIF analysis. A STROBE checklist was completed. Results IRT models yielded discrimination parameters ranging from 0.98–4.65 in NY and 1.25–6.94 in MA. Item difficulty parameters were within −3 to +3 range, suggesting a fair range of item difficulties exist in the scale. Only five of the 29 items on NP‐PCOCQ exhibited DIF, suggesting some other state‐related factor besides the measured construct influenced item responses; thus, the items were removed. Conclusion Our findings indicate that a shortened, 24‐item NP‐PCOCQ is capable of measuring organisational climate of NPs practicing in different U.S. states. NP‐PCOCQ can be used in future research to measure NP work environment. Relevance to clinical practice The tool can also be used by practice administrators to assess NP work environment and identify deficiencies to address them. This evidence about NP work environment can be used by practice administrators to promote favourable work environments for NPs to deliver high‐quality care.

Suggested Citation

  • Lusine Poghosyan & Affan Ghaffari & Jonathan Shaffer, 2019. "Nurse practitioner primary care organizational climate questionnaire: Item response theory and differential item functioning," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2934-2945, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2934-2945
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14895
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2934-2945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.