IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2844-2857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptom description in patients with chest pain—A qualitative analysis of emergency medical calls involving high‐risk conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Kristoffer Wibring
  • Johan Herlitz
  • Markus Lingman
  • Angela Bång

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the symptoms descriptions and situational information provided by patients during ongoing chest pain events caused by a high‐risk condition. Background Chest pain is a common symptom in patients contacting emergency dispatch centres. Only 15% of these patients are later classified as suffering from a high‐risk condition. Prehospital personnel are largely dependent on symptom characteristics when trying to identify these patients. Design Qualitative descriptive. Methods Manifest content analysis of 56 emergency medical calls involving patients with chest pain was carried out. A stratified purposive sampling was used to obtain calls concerning patients with high‐risk conditions. These calls were then listened to and transcribed. Thereafter, meaning units were identified and coded and finally categorised. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies guidelines have been applied. Results A wide range of situational information and symptoms descriptions was found. Pain and affected breathing were dominating aspects, but other situational information and several other symptoms were also reported. The situational information and these symptoms were classified into seven categories: Pain narrative, Affected breathing, Bodily reactions, Time, Bodily whereabouts, Fear and concern and Situation management. The seven categories consisted of 17 subcategories. Conclusions Patients with chest pain caused by a high‐risk condition present a wide range of symptoms which are described in a variety of ways. They describe different kinds of chest pain accompanied by pain from other parts of the body. Breathing difficulties and bodily reactions such as muscle weakness are also reported. The variety of symptoms and the absence of a typical symptomatology make risk stratification on the basis of symptoms alone difficult. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the importance of an open mind when assessing patients with chest pain and the requirement of a decision support tool in order to improve risk stratification in these patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristoffer Wibring & Johan Herlitz & Markus Lingman & Angela Bång, 2019. "Symptom description in patients with chest pain—A qualitative analysis of emergency medical calls involving high‐risk conditions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2844-2857, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2844-2857
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosse Ek & Marianne Svedlund, 2015. "Registered nurses' experiences of their decision‐making at an Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1122-1131, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2844-2857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.