IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2769-2781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using two models of workplace facilitation to create conditions for development of a person‐centred culture: A participatory action research study

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Hardiman
  • Jan Dewing

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine facilitation in workplace learning where nurses are focused on creating person‐centred cultures; to provide a framework for novice and proficient facilitators/practitioners to learn in and from their own workplaces and practices; and to provide the conditions where practitioners can gain an understanding of the culture and context within their own workplace. Background Evidence suggests that person‐centred cultures depend on purposeful, facilitated practice‐based learning activities. For person‐centredness to become more meaningful to nursing leaders in their daily work, focus must be placed on their acquisition and use of facilitation skills. The facilitation framework “Critical Companionship” remains an exemplar in the development of expert facilitation skills. Two sequential facilitation models were developed as “steps” towards Critical Companionship, as a framework for novice and proficient facilitators and practitioners to learn in and from their own workplaces and practices. Design and Methods This research, situated in a critical social science paradigm, drew on participatory action research to devise, explore and refine two facilitation models: Critical Allies and Critical Friends. The researcher adopted an insider approach to work with five nursing leaders, which was subsequently reported using the EQUATOR guidelines on best practice in reporting of participatory action research. Results The results show the complexity of enabling facilitation within the workplace. Four themes and twelve subthemes emerged from the data that describe the attributes needed to facilitate workplace learning and reveal that managers can have an active role in enabling person‐centred culture development. Conclusions This research adds to the body of knowledge on developing person‐centred culture. It offers practical stepping stones for novice and proficient facilitators to enable embodiment of the skills necessary to facilitate learning in person‐centred cultures. The models offer a workplace‐friendly pathway with practical methods and further contribute to our understanding of how we create person‐centred cultures. Relevance to clinical practice Facilitation of practice development and workplace learning remains the most effective methods to develop person‐centred cultures. This research introduces a pathway for clinical leaders/managers to become facilitators with their own teams, maximising the impact on the culture where care is delivered.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Hardiman & Jan Dewing, 2019. "Using two models of workplace facilitation to create conditions for development of a person‐centred culture: A participatory action research study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2769-2781, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2769-2781
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seán Paul Teeling & Jan Dewing & Deborah Baldie, 2021. "A Realist Inquiry to Identify the Contribution of Lean Six Sigma to Person-Centred Care and Cultures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Seán Paul Teeling & Jan Dewing & Deborah Baldie, 2022. "Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context–Mechanism–Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2769-2781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.