IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2235-2244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bed bath with soap and water or disposable wet wipes: Patients’ experiences and preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Pia L. Veje
  • Ming Chen
  • Christian S. Jensen
  • Jan Sørensen
  • Jette Primdahl

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain an in‐depth understanding of patients’ preferences regarding two bed bath methods: soap and water and disposable wet wipes. Background Bed baths allow hospitalised, bedridden patients to stay clean and fresh. They serve a number of purposes: health promotion, social propriety and pure pleasure. Traditionally, soap and water have been used for personal hygiene, but in recent years soap and water have increasingly been replaced by the use of disposable wet wipes. Design A qualitative study with a hermeneutical‐phenomenological approach was chosen to explore and understand patients’ experiences of bed bath methods. Methods Semi‐structured, individual, in‐depth interviews with 16 bedridden patients from three wards were conducted. The software program nvivo was used to structure the transcribed interviews and assist in the initial data analysis. The data were analysed and interpreted within a phenomenological‐hermeneutical framework. COREQ guidelines were used in the preparation of this paper (See Supporting information Appendix S1). Results Four overall themes were identified: “Creating a sense of cleanliness,” “Preferences and concerns in different situations,” “Cleanliness of hands and face” and “Clinical decision‐making about bed bath method.” Conclusions Overall, patients’ bed bath preference was for soap and water, but disposable wet wipes were considered a convenient alternative and preferred in certain circumstances, for example, when a patient had pain or diarrhoea. Shared decision‐making regarding bed bath method is recommended. Hands and face had specific requirements. Relevance to clinical practice Nursing staff should be aware that bedridden patients have varying preferences, and it is important to incorporate the patients’ preferences in the development of standards, health policies and clinical guidelines for bed bath practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Pia L. Veje & Ming Chen & Christian S. Jensen & Jan Sørensen & Jette Primdahl, 2019. "Bed bath with soap and water or disposable wet wipes: Patients’ experiences and preferences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2235-2244, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2235-2244
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14825
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juliana L Lopes & Luiz A Nogueira‐Martins & Alba LBL de Barros, 2013. "Bed and shower baths: comparing the perceptions of patients with acute myocardial infarction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 733-740, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Hui Tai & Tsung-Cheng Hsieh & Ru-Ping Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Two Bed Bath Practices in Cost and Vital Signs of Critically Ill Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-8, January.
    2. Özgül Öz & Gülzade Uysal & Duygu Sönmez Düzkaya, 2022. "Effect of Two Bathing Methods on Physiologic Parameters in Pediatric Intensive Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 858-865, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2235-2244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.