IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2206-2213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting the first‐attempt success rate of intravenous cannulation in older people

Author

Listed:
  • Sercan Yalçınlı
  • Funda Karbek Akarca
  • Özge Can
  • Alper Şener
  • Cemile Akbinar

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the factors affecting the first‐attempt success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement in older emergency department patients. Background In older patients who require intravenous treatment, establishing a PIVC as fast as possible is clinically important. Design This is a prospective, observational, descriptive study. Methods Using a data collection form, researchers questioned both the patient and the nurse performing the procedure in terms of patient‐ and operator‐related factors. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (See Supporting Information Appendix S1). Results A total of 472 patients were included in the final analyses. According to the logistic regression analysis, independent factors which affected first‐attempt failure were found to be: choosing a nonupper extremity site for PIVC (OR: 4.72, 95% CI: 1.35–16.45, p‐value: 0.015), history of difficult intravenous access (OR: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.72–5.29, p‐value:

Suggested Citation

  • Sercan Yalçınlı & Funda Karbek Akarca & Özge Can & Alper Şener & Cemile Akbinar, 2019. "Factors affecting the first‐attempt success rate of intravenous cannulation in older people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2206-2213, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2206-2213
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14816
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Piredda & Valentina Biagioli & Beatrice Barrella & Ilaria Carpisassi & Roberta Ghinelli & Diana Giannarelli & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2017. "Factors affecting difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults: a prospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1074-1084, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Xiong & Pengfei Zhan & Yimei Ding & Feng Mu & Yongxing Sun & Huijun Wang & Yin Bao & Cunliang Ji, 2019. "Which, Tourniquet or Inflation of Blood Pressure Cuff, can Dilate Peripheral Vein Adequately for Intravenous Access," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 14775-14784, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michela Piredda & Jacopo Fiorini & Gabriella Facchinetti & Valentina Biagioli & Anna Marchetti & Fabio Conti & Laura Iacorossi & Diana Giannarelli & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: A multicentre study comparing nurses' beliefs to evidence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3492-3504, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2206-2213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.