IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p2052-2061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beliefs and implementation of evidence‐based practice among community health nurses: A cross‐sectional descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Filipa Pereira
  • Victoria Pellaux
  • Henk Verloo

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe beliefs about evidence‐based practice and record levels of implementation among community health nurses working independently and in community healthcare centres in the canton of Valais, Switzerland. Background In many settings, evidence‐based practice is considered a key means of delivering better and secure health care. However, there is a paucity of published studies on the implementation of evidence‐based practice in community health care. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study (n = 100). Methods Beliefs about evidence‐based practice and levels of implementation were measured using validated scales developed by Melnyk et al. (Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 5, 2008, 208). Information on respondents’ sociodemographic and professional characteristics was collected. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The final response rate was 32.3% (n = 100). More than half of respondents had previously heard about evidence‐based practice; most believed in the value of using evidence to guide their practice and were prepared to improve their skills to be able to do so. However, the rate of implementation of evidence‐based practice in daily practice in the 8 weeks before the survey was poor. Statistically significant positive associations were found between beliefs about evidence‐based practice and how respondents had heard about it and between implementation rates and whether they had heard about evidence‐based practice and how they had done so. Evidence‐based practices requiring scientific knowledge and skills were implemented less frequently. Greater professional community healthcare experience and management roles did not increase implementation of evidence‐based practice. Conclusions The systematic implementation of evidence‐based practice by community health nurses working independently and in healthcare centres in Valais was rare, despite their positive beliefs about it. Relevance to clinical practice These results revealed the level of implementation of evidence‐based practice by nurses in community healthcare settings in Valais. Further research is required to better understand their needs and expectations and to develop suitable strategies that will allow the integration of evidence‐based practice into nurses’ daily practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Filipa Pereira & Victoria Pellaux & Henk Verloo, 2018. "Beliefs and implementation of evidence‐based practice among community health nurses: A cross‐sectional descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2052-2061, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2052-2061
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14348
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henk Verloo & Mario Desmedt & Diane Morin, 2017. "Adaptation and validation of the Evidence‐Based Practice Belief and Implementation scales for French‐speaking Swiss nurses and allied healthcare providers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2735-2743, September.
    2. Jolanda HHM Friesen‐Storms & Albine Moser & Sandra van der Loo & Anna JHM Beurskens & Gerrie JJW Bours, 2015. "Systematic implementation of evidence‐based practice in a clinical nursing setting: a participatory action research project," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 57-68, January.
    3. Teresa Moreno‐Casbas & Carmen Fuentelsaz‐Gallego & Ángel Gil de Miguel & Esther González‐María & Sean P Clarke, 2011. "Spanish nurses’ attitudes towards research and perceived barriers and facilitators of research utilisation: a comparative survey of nurses with and without experience as principal investigators," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 1936-1947, July.
    4. Helga E Breimaier & Ruud JG Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2011. "Nurses’ wishes, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers on implementing research findings into practice among graduate nurses in Austria," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1744-1756, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henk Verloo & Mario Desmedt & Diane Morin, 2017. "Adaptation and validation of the Evidence‐Based Practice Belief and Implementation scales for French‐speaking Swiss nurses and allied healthcare providers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2735-2743, September.
    2. Isaac Akomea-Frimpong & Caleb Boadi & Roger Owusu-Boafo, 2021. "Determinants and challenges of supplying microlife insurance in Ghana," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(3), pages 331-357, July.
    3. Manuela Hoedl & Daniela Schoberer & Ruud J. G. Halfens & Christa Lohrmann, 2018. "Adaptation of evidence‐based guideline recommendations to address urinary incontinence in nursing home residents according to the ADAPTE‐process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2974-2983, August.
    4. Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2016. "An evaluation of orthopaedic nurses' participation in an educational intervention promoting research usage – a triangulation convergence model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 846-855, March.
    5. Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen & Bibi Hølge‐Hazelton, 2018. "Caught between a rock and a hard place: An intrinsic single case study of nurse researchers’ experiences of the presence of a nursing research culture in clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1572-1580, April.
    6. Carol Hilliard & Maria Brenner, 2016. "Assimilation into daily practice: implementing and sustaining a randomised‐controlled trial in a children's clinical service," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 186-193, January.
    7. Oyeyemi Olajumoke Oyelade & Agathe Uwintonze & Munirat Olayinka Adebiyi, 2019. "Professionalism and Evidence-Based Mental Health Care: The Roadblocks and New Ways," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, October.
    8. Thi Ngoc Minh Nguyen & Anne Wilson, 2016. "Hospital readiness for undertaking evidence‐based practice: A survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 465-472, December.
    9. Yanfen Fu & Chunqing Wang & Yan Hu & Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, 2020. "The barriers to evidence‐based nursing implementation in mainland China: A qualitative content analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1038-1046, December.
    10. Ven Veeramah, 2016. "The use of evidenced‐based information by nurses and midwives to inform practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 340-350, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2052-2061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.