IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p1826-1835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations between patient symptoms and falls in an acute care hospital: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Anners Lerdal
  • Line Wangsvik Sigurdsen
  • Heidi Hammerstad
  • Tove Irene Granheim
  • Risk Study Research Group
  • Caryl L Gay

Abstract

Aim and objectives To describe associations between patient fall risk and common symptoms among hospitalised inpatients. Background Predictors of falls have been identified in a variety of populations and settings, but the role of inpatients’ symptom experience has not been adequately evaluated. Design Cross‐sectional. Methods Participants included 614 medical and elective surgical patients in an acute hospital in Norway. Patient falls during hospitalisation were assessed by self‐report and incident reports. Pain intensity and the occurrence and distress of 15 other symptoms were assessed by self‐report. Results Patient falls were associated with male sex and having more comorbidities. Medical patients were more likely to fall than elective surgical patients. In logistic regression analyses, higher symptom counts were associated with increased risk of fall, with each additional symptom conferring a 15% increase in fall risk. Symptom distress related to concentration difficulties, lack of energy, sleep problems, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea was associated with increased risk of fall, even after adjusting for the influence of age, sex and comorbidities (odds ratios ranged 2.3–4.8). Severe pain, as well as symptom distress related to drowsiness, itching, dizziness or swelling of arms/legs, was also associated with patient falls, although these associations were attenuated after accounting for age, sex and comorbidities. Overall, symptom distress was more strongly associated with fall risk than symptom occurrence. Conclusions Symptom burden and distress may help identify hospital patients at risk for fall. Additional research is needed to determine whether symptoms are useful for assessing fall risk among hospital patients and other high‐risk populations. If symptoms are useful indicators of fall risk, they should be considered for inclusion in standardised risk assessments. Relevance to clinical practice Clinicians ought to pay particular attention to increased fall risk among patients reporting many symptoms and those experiencing distress from concentration difficulties, fatigue, sleep problems, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea.

Suggested Citation

  • Anners Lerdal & Line Wangsvik Sigurdsen & Heidi Hammerstad & Tove Irene Granheim & Risk Study Research Group & Caryl L Gay, 2018. "Associations between patient symptoms and falls in an acute care hospital: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1826-1835, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1826-1835
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eirin Sigurdssøn Ludvigsen & Øystein Øygarden Flæten & Caryl L Gay & Magnus TarAngen & Tove Irene Granheim & Anners Lerdal, 2016. "Pain and concomitant symptoms in medical and elective surgical inpatients: a point prevalence survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3229-3240, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofie Jakobsson & Gisela Ringström & Eva Andersson & Björn Eliasson & Gudmundur Johannsson & Magnus Simrén & Eva Jakobsson Ung, 2020. "Patient safety before and after implementing person‐centred inpatient care — A quasi‐experimental study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 602-612, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1826-1835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.