IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p1803-1811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

STOPDVTs: Development and testing of a clinical assessment tool to guide nursing assessment of postoperative patients for Deep Vein Thrombosis

Author

Listed:
  • Alanna O'Brien
  • Bernice Redley
  • Beverley Wood
  • Mari Botti
  • Anastasia F Hutchinson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and test a clinical tool to guide nurses’ assessment of postoperative patients for Deep Vein Thrombosis. Background Preventing venous thromboembolism in hospitalised patients is an international patient safety priority. Despite high‐level evidence for optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, implementation is inconsistent and the incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis remains high. Methods A two‐stage sequential multi‐method design was used. In stage 1, the STOPDVTs tool was developed using a review of the literature and focus groups with local clinical experts. Stage 2 involved pilot testing the tool with 38 surgical nurses who conducted repeated assessments on a prospective sample of 50 postoperative orthopaedic patients. Results Stage 1: The focus group members who were members of the nursing leadership team agreed on eight local and systemic signs and symptoms that should be included in a nursing patient assessment tool for early Deep Vein Thrombosis. Local symptoms were pain in the limbs, calf swelling and tightness, changes in the affected limb's skin temperature. Systemic signs included in the tool were as follows: increased shortness of breath, increased respiratory and heart rates, and decreased oxygen saturation. Stage 2: The STOPDVTs tool had acceptable face and content validity, the agreement between the expert nurse and surgical nurses on assessments of individual signs and symptoms varied between 44%–94%. Surgical nurses were less likely than the expert nurse to identify signs indicative of Deep Vein Thrombosis. Conclusion Despite finding the STOPDVTs clinical assessment tool was a useful guide for nursing assessment, surgical nurses often underestimated the potential importance of clinical signs. The findings reveal a gap in nursing knowledge and skill in assessing for Deep Vein Thrombosis in postoperative orthopaedic patients. Relevance to clinical practice This study identified a possible risk to patient safety related to under‐recognition of the signs and symptoms of possible Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in postoperative orthopaedic patients. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of developing and implementing a protocol for consistent screening by nurses for possible DVT in the postoperative period.

Suggested Citation

  • Alanna O'Brien & Bernice Redley & Beverley Wood & Mari Botti & Anastasia F Hutchinson, 2018. "STOPDVTs: Development and testing of a clinical assessment tool to guide nursing assessment of postoperative patients for Deep Vein Thrombosis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1803-1811, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1803-1811
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1803-1811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.