IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8p1589-1598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the trauma patient experience and evaluation of hospital discharge practices to inform practice change: A mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Goldsmith
  • Andrea McCloughen
  • Kate Curtis

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the pain management experiences of recently discharged adult trauma patients and the discharge practices of the treating hospital. Background Adult trauma patients are not always able to manage their pain effectively and as a result often experience intense and enduring injury pain at home. They describe their pain experience as unique and debilitating, and report feeling uninformed at hospital discharge. There is a need to understand what is fundamentally required for this population at hospital discharge, to facilitate competent pain management and promote best possible outcomes. Design A mixed methods convergent study design. Methods The quantitative results (incidence, intensity and impact of injury pain and the barriers to effective pain management) were merged with the qualitative results (patient experiences and beliefs) to produce greater understanding about the reasons behind the pain management practices of participants. Results Integration of the quantitative and qualitative data produced four new themes. These themes demonstrate that recently discharged adult trauma patients do not have the knowledge or experience to understand or manage their injury pain effectively at home. Inadequate information and education by clinicians, at hospital discharge, contribute to this insufficiency. Conclusions Clinicians need to understand the trauma patient pain experience to appreciate the importance of their discharge practices. Increased understanding and implementation of evidence‐informed discharge processes would improve current discharge practices and ultimately support and improve the trauma patient's injury pain management practices at home. Relevance to clinical practice By understanding the patient perspective in the pain management of injuries, clinicians are better able to appreciate what hospital discharge practices and information are genuinely required by the trauma patient to manage their pain effectively at home, potentially preventing the long‐term consequences of injury pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Goldsmith & Andrea McCloughen & Kate Curtis, 2018. "Using the trauma patient experience and evaluation of hospital discharge practices to inform practice change: A mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1589-1598, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1589-1598
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Goldsmith & Kate Curtis & Andrea McCloughen, 2017. "Effective pain management in recently discharged adult trauma patients: Identifying patient and system barriers, a prospective exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4548-4557, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1589-1598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.