IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6p980-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of nurse‐led clinical pathway in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A quasi‐experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Ayda Kebapcı
  • Nevin Kanan

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and evaluate the effects of a nurse‐led clinical pathway for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Background A clinical pathway is a multidisciplinary care plan, based on evidence and guidelines to provide consistent, quality care to patients and improve outcomes. Design Prospective, quasi‐experimental design. Methods Patients hospitalised for coronary artery bypass graft between April 2014–November 2015 in a hospital in Turkey were studied. First 42 usual care patients were enrolled to determine outcomes and plan for the development of the clinical pathway followed by 40 patients in the newly developed clinical pathway. The primary outcome was length of stay and secondary outcomes related to recovery from surgery (e.g., time to extubation, first feeding). Results The mean age for the clinical pathway group was 60 and for usual care was 63 years. Most were male (CP = 78%, UC = 69%). There were significant differences between groups for the primary outcome. Length of stay in the intensive care unit was 38.9 hr for CP and 50.7 hr for usual care patients p

Suggested Citation

  • Ayda Kebapcı & Nevin Kanan, 2018. "Effects of nurse‐led clinical pathway in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A quasi‐experimental study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 980-988, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:980-988
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoping Liu & Da Wang & Liansheng Zheng & Tingyu Mou & Hao Liu & Guoxin Li, 2014. "Is Early Oral Feeding after Gastric Cancer Surgery Feasible? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin-Woo Kim & Yong-Gum Park & Jae-Hyung Kim & Eui-Chan Jang & Yong-Chan Ha, 2020. "The Optimal Time of Postoperative Feeding After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 31-36, January.
    2. Akinori Hisashige & Nobuyuki Shimizu & Yasuyuki Seto, 2021. "Cost-Effectiveness of Early Oral Feeding Following Total Gastrectomy," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-64, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:980-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.