IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6p1276-1286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing the quality of vital sign data in electronic health records: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Jean E Stevenson
  • Johan Israelsson
  • Goran Petersson
  • Peter A Bath

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate reasons for inadequate documentation of vital signs in an electronic health record. Background Monitoring vital signs is crucial to detecting and responding to patient deterioration. The ways in which vital signs are documented in electronic health records have received limited attention in the research literature. A previous study revealed that vital signs in an electronic health record were incomplete and inconsistent. Design Qualitative study. Methods Qualitative study. Data were collected by observing (68 hr) and interviewing nurses (n = 11) and doctors (n = 3), and analysed by thematic analysis to examine processes for measuring, documenting and retrieving vital signs in four clinical settings in a 353‐bed hospital. Results We identified two central reasons for inadequate vital sign documentation. First, there was an absence of firm guidelines for observing patients’ vital signs, resulting in inconsistencies in the ways vital signs were recorded. Second, there was a lack of adequate facilities in the electronic health record for recording vital signs. This led to poor presentation of vital signs in the electronic health record and to staff creating paper “workarounds.” Conclusions This study demonstrated inadequate routines and poor facilities for vital sign documentation in an electronic health record, and makes an important contribution to knowledge by identifying problems and barriers that may occur. Further, it has demonstrated the need for improved facilities for electronic documentation of vital signs. Relevance to clinical practice Patient safety may have been compromised because of poor presentation of vital signs. Thus, our results emphasised the need for standardised routines for monitoring patients. In addition, designers should consult the clinical end‐users to optimise facilities for electronic documentation of vital signs. This could have a positive impact on clinical practice and thus improve patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean E Stevenson & Johan Israelsson & Goran Petersson & Peter A Bath, 2018. "Factors influencing the quality of vital sign data in electronic health records: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1276-1286, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1276-1286
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14174
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2019. "Hospital nurses' professional accountability while using the National Early Warning Score: A qualitative study with a hermeneutic design," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4389-4399, December.
    2. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1276-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.