IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4pe451-e462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expertise in action: Insights into the dynamic nature of expertise in community‐based nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline A.W. Dickson
  • Chris McVittie
  • Anuj Kapilashrami

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain insight into community nurses' experiences and how they make sense of the expertise they offer in their role. Background Globally, the spotlight is currently on community nursing expertise because of the movement of hospital‐based to community‐based care. Caring for people at home is no longer solely concerned with prevention, but delivering complex care to patients who are acutely unwell or at the end of their life. Little is known about the distinct expertise of community nurses, or their contribution to patient outcomes. There is a need to examine expertise in this group in order to inform current and future care provision within community settings. Design A hermeneutic, phenomenological study. Method Semistructured interviews were conducted with eight community nurses in Scotland, UK, who hold an additional postregistration, professional qualification. Participants also kept audio‐journals. Data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Findings Participants described their expertise in three themes: negotiating a “way in” to care, managing complexity and “thinking on your feet.” They did not refer to themselves as specialist practitioners, nor did they perceive that they were viewed as specialist by colleagues or management. They appeared to dismiss their range of expertise which included forming trusting relationships, anticipating care needs and problem‐solving, enabling them to undertake complex care management. Conclusions Expertise of community nurses in this study is dynamic, contextualised and action‐oriented enabling them to be creative problem‐solvers. It reflects engagement with patients and families and all aspects of the setting where care is provided, rather than being solely an identifiable set of specialist skills. Relevance to clinical practice It is vital to recognise community‐based expertise internationally, especially if current WHO aims for community‐based health care are to be achieved. Highlighting this expertise contributes to current discourse and may be considered in education and practice reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline A.W. Dickson & Chris McVittie & Anuj Kapilashrami, 2018. "Expertise in action: Insights into the dynamic nature of expertise in community‐based nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 451-462, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e451-e462
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13950
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lesley Wilkes & Jane Cioffi & Joanne Cummings & Bronwyn Warne & Kathleen Harrison, 2014. "Clients with chronic conditions: community nurse role in a multidisciplinary team," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 844-855, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Yue & Tianmeng Xu & Brian Greene & Yongli Wang & Rongjin Wang & Guizhi Dai & Lijie Xu, 2020. "Caring in community nursing practice: Inductive content analysis reveals an inter‐dynamic system between patients and nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3025-3041, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e451-e462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.