IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p829-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses’ own experience of using a nurse‐initiated pain protocol based on their working experience

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Sturesson
  • Ann‐Charlotte Falk
  • Johanna Ulfvarson
  • Veronica Lindström

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore registered nurses’ (RNs) own experience of using the nurse‐initiated pain protocol (NIPP) in the emergency department (ED) based on their working experience. Background Pain is known to be one of the most common symptoms among adult patients seeking care at the ED. Several strategies aiming to improve pain management have been developed. Despite some improvements in pain management using NIPP, a large number of patients continue to have inadequate pain treatment when cared for in EDs. Design and method A cross‐sectional study design based on a questionnaire was used. The variable working experience was based on a theory that experience will make a change in RNs’ knowledge. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi‐square tests were used for analysing quantative data. Qualitative data were analysed by summative content analysis. Results Seventy RNs answered the questionnaire (response rate 42%) and 61% considered the NIPP adequate to relieve patients’ acute pain at the ED. No significant difference was found on how the RNs used the NIPP. However, qualitative data showed that more experienced RNs adapt the NIPP according to the patients’ needs in a higher extent. Conclusion A majority of the RNs consider the NIPP to be adequate to relieve patients’ acute pain in the ED. An increase in working experience showed an impact on how the NIPP was used, with an increase in pain management that is personalised depending on individual patients’ needs. The RNs used several alternatives to both dosage and type of medication when the ED becomes crowded. Relevance to clinical practice Registered nurses’ working experience should be considered when planning nursing schedules to be better able to meet patients’ needs. Guidelines should be developed and evaluated by both healthcare professionals and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Sturesson & Ann‐Charlotte Falk & Johanna Ulfvarson & Veronica Lindström, 2018. "Registered nurses’ own experience of using a nurse‐initiated pain protocol based on their working experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 829-835, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:829-835
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:829-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.