IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p4100-4111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that have an impact on knowledge, attitude and practice related to kangaroo care: National survey study among neonatal nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Qingqi Deng
  • Yao Zhang
  • Qiufang Li
  • Hua Wang
  • Xinfen Xu

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore factors that impact nurses’ knowledge, perceptions and practice related to kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units in China. Background It is recognised extensively that kangaroo care is an effective intervention for improving the outcomes of preterm infants and has been recommended as a routine practice for neonatal care. However, this practice is uncommon in China and little is known about neonatal nurses’ knowledge and attitude. Design A descriptive cross‐sectional survey. Methods An online questionnaire was completed by 830 neonatal nurses. Data were analysed using measures of central tendency, dispersion, ANOVA, t tests and the general linear model. Results A total of 48.2% of the participants reported practicing kangaroo care. Range of score for each scale was knowledge 0–16 (M = 9.62), perceptions 28–103 (M = 79.99), barriers 17–85 (M = 65.40) and practice 11–55 (M = 34.44). Experience in using kangaroo care was a primary factor for the scores of four scales. Particularly, experienced nurses had higher level of knowledge and perceived less barriers. Respondents’ role in neonatal intensive care units considerably influenced perceptions and practice level. Nurses’ highest education and neonatal intensive care unit level also influenced the knowledge and practice score, separately. A major barrier to practice was the reluctance of physicians, nurses and parents. Conclusion Neonatal nurses’ knowledge, attitude and practice levels related to kangaroo care were relatively low. Results suggested that leadership and knowledgeable practitioners could initiate education and clinical training to improve nurses’ knowledge and awareness on the efficacy of kangaroo care. Moreover, initiatives and behaviours would be enhanced following increased knowledge and perceived value. Such barriers as the reluctance of medical staff may likewise be lowered or removed after experiencing kangaroo care. Relevance to clinical practice Neonatal nurses’ knowledge and belief need to be improved for optimal practice of kangaroo care. Organisational support and clear guidelines are also in need for successful kangaroo care.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingqi Deng & Yao Zhang & Qiufang Li & Hua Wang & Xinfen Xu, 2018. "Factors that have an impact on knowledge, attitude and practice related to kangaroo care: National survey study among neonatal nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4100-4111, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4100-4111
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14556
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yueh‐Chen Yeh & Winsome St John & Lorraine Venturato, 2014. "Doing the month in a Taiwanese postpartum nursing center: An ethnographic study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 343-351, September.
    2. Gabriel Seidman & Shalini Unnikrishnan & Emma Kenny & Scott Myslinski & Sarah Cairns-Smith & Brian Mulligan & Cyril Engmann, 2015. "Barriers and Enablers of Kangaroo Mother Care Practice: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Evalotte Mörelius & Gene Cranston Anderson, 2015. "Neonatal nurses’ beliefs about almost continuous parent–infant skin‐to‐skin contact in neonatal intensive care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2620-2627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delia Cristóbal Cañadas & Tesifón Parrón Carreño & Cristina Sánchez Borja & Antonio Bonillo Perales, 2022. "Benefits of Kangaroo Mother Care on the Physiological Stress Parameters of Preterm Infants and Mothers in Neonatal Intensive Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Nantaporn Sansiriphun & Kannika Kantaruksa & Areewan Klunklin & Chavee Baosuang & Saowanee Liamtrirat, 2015. "The journey into fatherhood: A grounded theory study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 460-466, December.
    3. Inez Koopman & Jennifer A. Callaghan‐Koru & Oluwatope Alaofin & Cynthia H. Argani & Azadeh Farzin, 2016. "Early skin‐to‐skin contact for healthy full‐term infants after vaginal and caesarean delivery: a qualitative study on clinician perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1367-1376, May.
    4. Sylvia Hsi‐Ching Chang & Wendy A Hall & Suzanne Campbell & Lily Lee, 2018. "Experiences of Chinese immigrant women following “Zuo Yue Zi” in British Columbia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1385-1394, April.
    5. Ulviye Günay & Didem Coşkun Şimşek, 2021. "Emotions and Experience of Fathers applying Kangaroo Care in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey: A Qualitative Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(6), pages 840-846, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4100-4111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.