IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3641-3651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of sacral tissue oxygen saturation among immobile patients

Author

Listed:
  • Burcu Ceylan
  • Ulku Yapucu Gunes
  • Mehmet Uyar

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the effect of immobility on sacral tissue oxygen saturation in patients lying on a supporting surface in supine position. Background Guidelines in regard to preventing pressure ulcers recommend that patients lying on a standard bed should change their positions every 2 hr and that patients on a supporting surface should change their positions every 4 hr. But there is no strong evidence that justifies this practice. Design Quasi‐experimental. Methods Data for the research were collected over the period October 2014–March 2015 at Anesthesiology and Reanimation and Neurosurgery Clinic Intensive Care Units. A total of 46 patients matching the research criteria were left in the supine position for 4 hr without having a position change, during which time sacral tissue oxygen saturation was measured every hour on the hour. Sacral tissue oxygen saturation was measured with the InSpectra Tissue Oxygenation Monitor. Results Mean sacral tissue oxygen saturation was 73.4% at baseline and was then measured as 74.9% at the first hour, 72.3% at the second hour, 71.9% at the third hour and 71.9% at the fourth hour. The changes observed between measuring times were not found to be statistically significant (p = .09). Conclusions No statistically significant differences were found between sacral tissue oxygen saturation values recorded over a period of 4 hr in immobile patients lying on a supporting surface in the supine position. However, it was observed that sacral tissue oxygen saturation values did not change significantly depending upon the type of supporting surface that was being used. Relevance to clinical practice The study outcome supports changing the position of a patient lying on a supporting surface every 4 hr and provides evidence that justifies the recommendation made in the guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Burcu Ceylan & Ulku Yapucu Gunes & Mehmet Uyar, 2018. "Examination of sacral tissue oxygen saturation among immobile patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3641-3651, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3641-3651
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14218
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khadijeh Hoviattalab & Haydeh Hashemizadeh & Gibson D'Cruz & Ruud JG Halfens & Theo Dassen, 2015. "Nursing practice in the prevention of pressure ulcers: an observational study of German Hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1513-1524, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marianne Brostrup Sachs & Mia Moth Wolffbrandt & Ingrid Poulsen, 2018. "Prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing subacute rehabilitation after severe brain injury: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2776-2784, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3641-3651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.