IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p3115-3122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staff members’ ambivalence on caring for patients with multidrug‐resistant bacteria at their end of life: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna M Tiedtke
  • Stephanie Stiel
  • Maria Heckel
  • Franziska A Herbst
  • Alexander Sturm
  • Cornel Sieber
  • Christoph Ostgathe
  • Frieder R Lang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore healthcare professionals’ personal experiences, feelings and attitudes about caring for hospitalised patients with multidrug‐resistant bacteria in palliative and geriatric care. Background Working in end‐of‐life care involves at times burdening demands that affect not only healthcare professionals personally but also their actions. It is suggested that multidrug‐resistant bacteria and their consequences for colonised or infected patients in hospitals are among the challenges for all professionals in end‐of‐life care. Little is known about the feelings and experiences of staff members during healthcare activities with regard to these bacteria. Design A qualitative interview study in two German hospitals. Methods We interviewed 35 staff members from a German palliative care unit and a geriatric unit about their experiences with multidrug‐resistant bacteria in end‐of‐life care and the management of colonised or infected patients. Semistructured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using grounded theory. Results Interviewees represented two interdisciplinary teams with 40% nurses, 26% physicians and 34% other professionals. Salient themes that were identified included impact of multidrug‐resistant bacteria on staff members’ personal actions, feelings and attitudes towards the bacteria and the required isolation measures. Besides higher workload and consequences for working routines, the patients’ palliative care needs were recognised, as well as the necessary protection measures to avoid contaminations in hospital. Healthcare professionals reported a dilemma that they experienced when facing these diverse demands. Conclusions Findings point to emotional and behavioural ambivalence in end‐of‐life care among staff members because necessary isolation measures and particular situation in end‐of‐life care create unsolvable conflicts for healthcare professionals. Possible strategies to cope with ambivalence are discussed. Relevance to clinical practice Healthcare professionals in palliative and geriatric care have to deal with multidrug‐resistant bacteria and have to face contradictory feelings while trying to fulfil patients’ needs as well as isolation requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna M Tiedtke & Stephanie Stiel & Maria Heckel & Franziska A Herbst & Alexander Sturm & Cornel Sieber & Christoph Ostgathe & Frieder R Lang, 2018. "Staff members’ ambivalence on caring for patients with multidrug‐resistant bacteria at their end of life: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3115-3122, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3115-3122
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3115-3122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.