IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p2953-2962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of older adults’ and family caregivers’ perspectives regarding their preoperative care transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ann M. Malley
  • Mary Bourbonniere
  • Mary Naylor

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how older patients with multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers perceive their engagement and overall care experience throughout the preoperative phase of elective orthopaedic hip or knee joint replacement. Background Patient engagement is a critical component of care necessary for improving patient outcomes. Little is known about how older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers engage in preoperative care transitions and the subsequent impact of this experience on postoperative health outcomes. Design Prospective qualitative descriptive design was used. Methods Semi‐structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of older adults coping with multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers. Interviews were conducted prior to surgery and, again 21 days postsurgery, were audio‐recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis. The Quality Health Outcomes Model was used to categorise study findings. Results Eleven patients and five family caregivers participated. Guided by the Quality Health Outcomes Model, four major themes were identified. (i) Older adults perceive that joint replacement is about quality of life. (ii) Standardised interventions often fail to address the unique needs of complex older adults. (iii) Family caregivers perceive they are the primary care coordinators. (iv) Postoperative outcomes and resource utilisation vary widely in complex older adults. Conclusion Findings suggest that current preoperative care interventions are often not designed to effectively engage complex older patients and their family caregivers. Coordinated patient‐centred preoperative care that reflects the needs and goals of complex older patients and their family caregivers may positively influence perioperative care transitions and outcomes beyond this episode of care. Relevance to clinical practice The current research documents the need for more in‐depth knowledge about the relationship between older adults’ and their family caregivers’ engagement preoperatively and postoperative outcomes and resource utilisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann M. Malley & Mary Bourbonniere & Mary Naylor, 2018. "A qualitative study of older adults’ and family caregivers’ perspectives regarding their preoperative care transitions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 2953-2962, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:2953-2962
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Halberg & Lone Assafi & Gitte Kammersgård & Pia Søe Jensen, 2020. "“Wow I had no idea”—How job rotation is experienced by nurses caring for elective orthopaedic patients: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 932-943, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:2953-2962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.