IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i13-14p2740-2751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High‐risk respiratory patients' experiences of bronchoscopy with conscious sedation and analgesia: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Saxon
  • Paul Fulbrook
  • Kwun M. Fong
  • Chantal F Ski

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the experiences of high‐risk respiratory patients undergoing bronchoscopy with conscious sedation. Background Due to possible complications, high‐risk respiratory patients are usually given smaller, cautious doses of sedation and analgesia for bronchoscopy. Described as “conscious sedation,” this facilitates depression of the patient's consciousness without causing respiratory compromise. Previously, studies have investigated patient experience using quantitative methods. This is the first study that has explored the patient experience during bronchoscopy from a qualitative perspective. Design Qualitative, phenomenological approach as described by Van Manen. Methods The setting was an endoscopy unit within an Australian tertiary hospital. Unstructured interviews were conducted with 13 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who underwent day‐case bronchoscopy. All participants received conscious sedation. They were interviewed twice, within a week, postprocedure. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Van Manen's interpretive approach. Findings Participants had varying experiences. Five themes emerged from the analysis: Frustration and fear; Comfort and safety; Choking and coughing; Being aware; and Consequences. Whilst not all participants experienced procedural awareness or remembered it, for those who did it was a significant event. Overall, experiences were found to be negative; however, participants accepted and tolerated them, perceiving them as necessary to obtain a diagnostic result. Conclusion The findings demonstrate that often patients are aware during the procedure and their experience may be uncomfortable and distressing. Relevance to clinical practice These findings have implications for patient preparation pre‐ and post‐bronchoscopy in terms of what they might expect, and to discuss what has happened after the procedure. Some practices of the bronchoscopy team during the procedure may need modification. For example, in anticipation of the possibility that the patient may be aware, healthcare professionals should provide patient‐focused explanations of what is happening during the procedure, as well as providing ongoing reassurance that everything is going as planned.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Saxon & Paul Fulbrook & Kwun M. Fong & Chantal F Ski, 2018. "High‐risk respiratory patients' experiences of bronchoscopy with conscious sedation and analgesia: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2740-2751, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:13-14:p:2740-2751
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:13-14:p:2740-2751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.