IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i13-14p2673-2683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilisation of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in Australians at risk of hepatitis B virus‐related carcinoma and prescribed anti‐viral therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne Sheppard‐Law
  • Iryna Zablotska‐Manos
  • Melissa Kermeen
  • Susan Holdaway
  • Alice Lee
  • Jacob George
  • Amany Zekry
  • Lisa Maher

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate hepatocellular carcinoma screening utilisation and factors associated with utilisation among patients prescribed hepatitis B virus anti‐viral therapy and at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Background The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma has increased in Australia over the past three decades with chronic hepatitis B virus infection a major contributor. hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance programs aim to detect cancers early enabling curative treatment options, longer survival and longer times to recurrence. Design Multi‐site cross‐sectional survey. Methods An online study questionnaire was administered to eligible participants attending three Sydney tertiary hospitals. Data were grouped into six mutually exclusive hepatocellular carcinoma risk factor categories as per American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines. All analyses were undertaken in STATA. Logistic regression was used to assess the associations between covariates and screening utilisation. Multivariate models described were assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit. Results Of the 177 participants, 137 (77.4%) self‐reported that US had been performed in the last six months. Awareness that screening should be performed and knowing the correct frequency of US screening were independently associated with screening utilisation. Participants who knew that screening should be undertaken were three times more likely to have had pretreatment education or were prescribed hepatitis B virus anti‐viral treatment for >4 years. Participants reporting a family history of hepatocellular carcinoma were less likely to know that screening should be undertaken every 6 months. Conclusion While utilisation of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance programs was higher in this study than in previous reports, strategies to further improve surveillance remain necessary. Relevance to clinical practice Findings from this research form the basis for proposing strategies to improve utilisation of hepatocellular carcinoma screening, inform hepatitis B virus‐related clinical practice and for the delivery of care and nursing education to people receiving hepatitis B virus anti‐viral therapy and at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne Sheppard‐Law & Iryna Zablotska‐Manos & Melissa Kermeen & Susan Holdaway & Alice Lee & Jacob George & Amany Zekry & Lisa Maher, 2018. "Utilisation of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in Australians at risk of hepatitis B virus‐related carcinoma and prescribed anti‐viral therapy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2673-2683, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:13-14:p:2673-2683
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:13-14:p:2673-2683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.