IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2425-2437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Dignity”: A central construct in nursing home staff understandings of quality continence care

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz
  • Emily Tomlinson
  • Alison M Hutchinson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore nursing home staff members’ beliefs and expectations about what constitutes “quality continence care” for people living in nursing homes. Background Most nursing home residents require assistance to maintain continence or manage incontinence. Best practice guidelines promote active investigation of incontinence, treatment of underlying potentially reversible causes, and initial conservative interventions to prevent, minimise and/or treat incontinence. Despite research showing the positive benefits of implementing active interventions, translating the findings of research into practice in nursing homes has been modest. Understanding the perspectives of individuals who provide continence care may help bridge the gap between evidence and practice. Design A qualitative exploratory descriptive design. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 nursing home staff: eight registered nurses, four enrolled nurses and seven personal care workers working in a nursing home in Australia between 2014–2015. Data were analysed inductively to identify themes and subthemes that described and explained staff beliefs about quality continence care in nursing homes. Findings Participants’ understanding and expectations about quality continence care were linked to beliefs about incontinence being an intractable and undignified condition in nursing homes. The key theme to emerge was “protecting residents’ dignity” which was supported by the following six subthemes: (i) using pads, ii) providing privacy, (iii) knowing how to “manage” incontinence, (iv) providing timely continence care, (v) considering residents’ continence care preferences and (vi) communicating sensitively. Conclusion The findings provide new insight into the basis for continence care practices in nursing homes. Education about continence care should challenge beliefs that limit continence care practice to cleaning, containing and concealing incontinence. There is a need for a multidimensional framework that is informed by social, psychological and biomedical research about incontinence, research about the fundamental elements of care, care‐dependent individuals’ expectations about care, and values about dignity and care. Relevance to clinical practice The in‐depth exploration led to an understanding of the basis for continence care practices that centre on cleaning, containing and concealing residents’ incontinence in some nursing homes. There is a need to review the quality of education for the aged care workforce about incontinence to ensure it equips them with a broad understanding of the fundamentals of care and how to enact dignity in continence care through a resident‐centred approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz & Emily Tomlinson & Alison M Hutchinson, 2018. "“Dignity”: A central construct in nursing home staff understandings of quality continence care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2425-2437, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2425-2437
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2425-2437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.