IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2322-2332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Descriptions of fundamental care needs in cancer care—An exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Åsa Muntlin Athlin
  • Maria Brovall
  • Yvonne Wengström
  • Tiffany Conroy
  • Alison L. Kitson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the experiences of the fundamentals of care for people with a cancer diagnosis, from diagnosis to after adjuvant treatment. Background More focus is needed on the experience of people living with cancer, as current cancer care more emphasises on independence and resilience without fully acknowledging that there will be moments in the cancer journey where patients will need “basic nursing care” to manage their symptoms and care pathways. Design Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Method Secondary thematic analysis of interview data from 30 people with a diagnosis of breast (n = 10), colorectal (n = 10) or prostate (n = 10) cancer was undertaken. Results The findings revealed vivid descriptions of the fundamentals of care (i.e., basic needs) and participants described physical, psychosocial and relational aspects of the delivery of care. Both positive (e.g., supportive and kind) and negative (e.g., humiliating) experiences related to the relationship with the healthcare professionals were re‐counted and affected the participants’ experiences of the fundamentals of care. Participants’ accounts of their fundamental care needs were provided without them identifying who, within the healthcare system, was responsible for providing these needs. Specific nursing interventions were seldom described. Conclusion Some people with a cancer diagnosis have to strive for help and support from the nursing staff to manage to regain control over their recovery. Nurses in cancer care need to focus on the patients’ fundamental care needs to optimise their patients’ recovery. Relevance to clinical practice Cancer patients require support with their fundamental care needs and nurses need to be more aware of this and integrate it into the caring relationship. It is imperative that the complexity of the nurse–patient relationship is acknowledged and that models of care which honour this complexity are used.

Suggested Citation

  • Åsa Muntlin Athlin & Maria Brovall & Yvonne Wengström & Tiffany Conroy & Alison L. Kitson, 2018. "Descriptions of fundamental care needs in cancer care—An exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2322-2332, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2322-2332
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison L. Kitson & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2013. "Development and Preliminary Testing of a Framework to Evaluate Patients' Experiences of the Fundamentals of Care: A Secondary Analysis of Three Stroke Survivor Narratives," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-12, June.
    2. Carina Palesjö & Lena Nordgren & Margareta Asp, 2015. "Being in a critical illness‐recovery process: a phenomenological hermeneutical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3494-3502, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Matteo Danielis, 2021. "To what extent Unfinished Nursing Care tools coincide with the discrete elements of The Fundamentals of Care Framework? A comparative analysis based on a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 239-265, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Bagnasco & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Carolina Galanti & Gloria Varone & Gianluca Catania & Milko Zanini & Giuseppe Aleo & Roger Watson & Mark Hayter & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Unmet nursing care needs on medical and surgical wards: A scoping review of patients’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 347-369, February.
    2. Alison Kitson, 2018. "Moving on…," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2175-2176, June.
    3. Rebecca Feo & Tiffany Conroy & Eva Jangland & Åsa Muntlin Athlin & Maria Brovall & Jenny Parr & Karin Blomberg & Alison Kitson, 2018. "Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: A modified Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2285-2299, June.
    4. Jackie Robinson & Tess Moeke‐Maxell & Jenny Parr & Julia Slark & Stella Black & Lisa Williams & Merryn Gott, 2020. "Optimising compassionate nursing care at the end of life in hospital settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1788-1796, June.
    5. Rebecca Feo & Alison Kitson & Tiffany Conroy, 2018. "How fundamental aspects of nursing care are defined in the literature: A scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2189-2229, June.
    6. Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen & Jan P.H. Hamers & Silke F. Metzelthin & Roelof Ettema & Maud Heinen & Janneke M. de Man‐Van Ginkel & Hester Vermeulen & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Marieke J. Schuurmans, 2018. "Basic nursing care: The most provided, the least evidence based – A discussion paper," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2496-2505, June.
    7. Claire Minton & Tamara Power & Stacey Wilson & Debra Jackson, 2020. "Understanding recovery and survivorship after a prolonged critical illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 665-666, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2322-2332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.