IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2274-2284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privacy at end of life in ICU: A review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Timmins
  • Stelios Parissopoulos
  • Sotirios Plakas
  • Margaret T Naughton
  • Jan MA de Vries
  • Georgia Fouka

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the issues surrounding privacy during death in ICU. Background While the provision of ICU care is vital, the nature and effect of the potential lack of privacy during death and dying in ICUs have not been extensively explored. Design A literature search using CINAHL and Pubmed revealed articles related to privacy, death and dying in ICU. Method Keywords used in the search were “ICU,” “Privacy,” “Death” and “Dying.” A combination of these terms using Boolean operators “or” or “and” revealed a total of 23 citations. Six papers were ultimately deemed suitable for inclusion in the review and were subjected to code analysis with Atlas.ti v8 QDA software. Findings The analysis of the studies revealed eight themes, and this study presents the three key themes that were found to be recurring and strongly interconnected to the experience of privacy and death in ICU: “Privacy in ICU,” “ICU environment” and “End‐of‐Life Care”. Conclusions Research has shown that patient and family privacy during the ICU hospitalisation and the provision of the circumstances that lead to an environment of privacy during and after death remains a significant challenge for ICU nurses. Family members have little or no privacy in shared room and cramped waiting rooms, while they wish to be better informed and involved in end‐of‐life decisions. Hence, death and dying for many patients takes place in open and/or shared spaces which is problematic in terms of both the level of privacy and respect that death ought to afford. Relevance to clinical practice It is best if end‐of‐life care in the ICU is planned and coordinated, where possible. Nurses need to become more self‐reflective and aware in relation to end‐of‐life situations in ICU in order to develop privacy practices that are responsive to family and patient needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Timmins & Stelios Parissopoulos & Sotirios Plakas & Margaret T Naughton & Jan MA de Vries & Georgia Fouka, 2018. "Privacy at end of life in ICU: A review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2274-2284, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2274-2284
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2274-2284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.